Can we copy information using reversible operations?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of reversible operations and their ability to mimic information copying processes. The author presents a model involving three distinct numbers (A, B, and C) to illustrate that while transformations can create the appearance of copying, true information copying requires altering all previous values to maintain consistency. The conversation highlights the conflict between classical information copying and quantum mechanics, specifically referencing the no cloning theorem, which asserts that exact copies of quantum states cannot be made without violating fundamental principles of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of reversible operations in mathematics
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics and the no cloning theorem
  • Basic knowledge of unitary evolution in quantum systems
  • Concept of information theory and its implications in classical vs. quantum contexts
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the no cloning theorem in quantum computing
  • Study reversible operations and their applications in information theory
  • Investigate unitary evolution and its role in quantum mechanics
  • Examine classical information copying techniques and their limitations in quantum contexts
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in quantum mechanics, computer scientists focusing on quantum computing, and anyone interested in the philosophical implications of information theory in classical and quantum realms.

zonde
Gold Member
Messages
2,960
Reaction score
224
TL;DR
In QM interpretations discussions there is idea that classical world could be modeled using just reversible unitary evolution. But in classical world we can make copies of information. Is there any conflict between this idea and this observation?
I am trying to investigate my doubts that reversible operations can model (or at least mimic) information copy process.

For simple model I take two numbers ##A \neq B##. Now I can't copy value of A into B without erasing (irreversibly) value of B. However I can use transformation that replaces value of A with new value A' such that A'=B'. That would mimic information copy process because result of copy process we verify by comparing original with copy.
But now I take third number C (##C \neq B'##) and try to copy value of B' into C. Using the same transformation as previously I replace B' with B'' such that B''=C' so that it seems I copied B into C. But now ##C' \neq A'## so the appearance of copy operation fails.
So it seems that only way how to mimic copy operation is to change all the previous copies every time a new copy is made (when I copy B' into C I have to replace A', B' and C with A'', B'' and C' such that A''=B''=C').

Does this simplified model seems universal enough to apply to any reversible transformation including QM unitary evolution?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zonde said:
Summary: In QM interpretations discussions there is idea that classical world could be modeled using just reversible unitary evolution. But in classical world we can make copies of information. Is there any conflict between this idea and this observation?

Yes, because in quantum mechanics there is something called the no cloning theorem, which says that it is impossible to make an exact copy of a quantum state. If the dynamics of reversible unitary evolution allowed copying of information, the no cloning theorem would be violated.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K