Can We See an Atom? - Comments

  • Context: Insights 
  • Thread starter Thread starter klotza
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atom
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the visualization of atoms using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), particularly in single-layer graphene. Participants reference an article by Prof. Philip Moriarty that clarifies misconceptions about TEM images, specifically regarding whether atoms appear as bright or dark spots. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the imaging techniques, noting that the appearance of atoms in TEM images depends on whether a bright field or dark field technique is used. The discussion also touches on the complexities of visualizing quantum phenomena, such as electron wavefunctions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
  • Familiarity with single-layer graphene properties
  • Knowledge of bright field and dark field imaging techniques
  • Basic concepts of quantum mechanics and electron wavefunctions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM)
  • Explore the properties and applications of single-layer graphene
  • Learn about bright field vs. dark field imaging techniques in microscopy
  • Study the fundamentals of quantum mechanics related to electron behavior
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and materials scientists interested in atomic-scale imaging techniques and the properties of materials like graphene.

klotza
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
80
Reaction score
113
klotza submitted a new PF Insights post

Can We See an Atom?

atoms-80x80.png


Continue reading the Original PF Insights Post.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pangru and Greg Bernhardt
Physics news on Phys.org
Kudos on your Insights article. Your explanations and graphics helped make it clear.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
I've seen many of these "atom" photos online. Nice to get some explanations!
 
Thank You for this really nice article !
 
eq66 said:
Thank You for this really nice article !
Glad you liked it!
 
Very interesting.

But I'm confused with the image just below the text that reads: "The technology has improved over the years, and now it is possible perform TEM on single-layer graphene and see the atomic structure from a sheet of carbon, which I think is pretty impressive."

This illustration pretty clearly shows carbon atoms as *light* spots, not dark spots. But the caption to the immediately previous image reads: "The bright spots on the image are regions where there are fewer atoms blocking the electrons."

In a TEM image, are the atoms bright, or are they dark?
 
Great job, Klotza!
 
Amrator said:
Great job, Klotza!
Thanks!
 
  • #10
zinq said:
Very interesting.

But I'm confused with the image just below the text that reads: "The technology has improved over the years, and now it is possible perform TEM on single-layer graphene and see the atomic structure from a sheet of carbon, which I think is pretty impressive."

This illustration pretty clearly shows carbon atoms as *light* spots, not dark spots. But the caption to the immediately previous image reads: "The bright spots on the image are regions where there are fewer atoms blocking the electrons."

In a TEM image, are the atoms bright, or are they dark?
it depends whether they're dark field or bright field image.
 
  • #11
How did Ernst Mach say: "Ah Atome! Ham's scho ans g'sehn?" (Ah atoms! Did you already see one?)
 
  • #12
"Can We See an Atom?"

Heck, I've never seen my face. I'm sure I got one.

Have we ever seen the sun, much less other stars? We see their light, yet where are they when we finally perceive them? You can do the math; it's hurting my head to figure it. I am sure these heavenly bodies aren't where they were when we finally perceive their light.

Have we seen the Higgs boson?

<detour> Higgs boson walks into church. Priest says, we don't allow Higgs boson in here. Higgs boson says, yeah, but without me how can you have mass? </detour>

Stick a fork in me. :)
 
  • #13
''the tunneling probability depends on the electron density of the surface, so you can actually visualize the wavefunction of the unbound surface electrons, in the images.'' The second half is not quite true, as the wave function of the electrons is a multiparticle wave function and we see something in 3 dimensions. What is visualized is the charge density of the electron field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K