SF49erfan
- 24
- 0
Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?
The discussion revolves around the visibility of atoms and subatomic particles, such as electrons and protons, and how their existence and behavior can be inferred despite their invisibility to the naked eye. Participants explore various methods of detection and evidence supporting atomic theory, as well as historical perspectives on the development of atomic models.
Participants express a range of views on whether atoms can be seen or merely detected, with no clear consensus reached. Some agree on the importance of experimental evidence, while others challenge the framing of the question itself.
The discussion includes references to various methods of imaging and detecting atoms, such as X-rays and quantum cameras, but does not resolve the complexities involved in these techniques or their implications for atomic theory.
This discussion may be of interest to those studying atomic theory, experimental physics, or anyone curious about the nature of matter and the methods used to explore it.
AAAmelia said:Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?
Trave11er said:Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.
Trave11er said:Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.
phinds said:Very cool. Thanks for posting.
I'd flip that over and say that in experimental sciences, very little (close to nothing) is based on what can be seen with our eyes.ZapperZ said:The existence of atoms involves MORE than just what you can (or cannot) see with your eyes!
AAAmelia said:Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?
Emilyjoint said:probably better to ask can we detect atoms rather that can we see.
you do not need to see with your eyes to know something exists.
sophiecentaur said:I have never seen the back of my neck bit I can be pretty certain it's there.
Mark44 said:Starting a thread and never returning to it.
davenn said:likewise
thankyou -- amazing what they can achieve these days
here's the longer video showing the making of the movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBpu4OPw6bM
Dave
AAAmelia said:I guess sometimes I just think it's OK to not respond, since it might be a "waste" of people's time for me to just say, "AWESOME!" or something like that
Hi guys - I don't mean to "hit and run" as you call it and I apologize if that is the traditional forum etiquette here to return to a thread to post afterwards.
I guess sometimes I just think it's OK to not respond, since it might be a "waste" of people's time for me to just say, "AWESOME!" or something like that,
Trave11er said:Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.
AAAmelia said:Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?
sophiecentaur said:Afaics, if the OP doesn't return after a page or two of thread then it's open season. The thing to do, if you really don't know much about the subject you post a question about, you should make that clear. If you are already half way there then I feel you should word the question appropriately (say, with some Maths). It's all too easy to give an answer that's way below or above what the OP wants and that can frustrate everyone.
I have read some excellent questions that start off "I am doing AS Physics and I have just come across a problem with the Photoelectric effect . . . . ." We all know where we stand then and the OP will probably have got the answer after a couple of responses.