Can we see atoms? How do we know they exist?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SF49erfan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atoms
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the visibility of atoms and subatomic particles, such as electrons and protons, and how their existence and behavior can be inferred despite their invisibility to the naked eye. Participants explore various methods of detection and evidence supporting atomic theory, as well as historical perspectives on the development of atomic models.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Historical

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that we can "see" atoms using advanced tools that enhance our perception, suggesting that visibility is not limited to direct sight.
  • Others emphasize that the existence of atoms is supported by experimental evidence, particularly the accuracy of atomic energy level descriptions compared to experimental results.
  • A few participants propose that the question might be better framed as one of detection rather than visibility, arguing that existence can be established without direct observation.
  • Some mention the historical development of atomic theory, noting that evidence for atoms existed long before they could be visually confirmed.
  • There are references to various resources and videos that illustrate atomic behavior and detection methods, including the smallest movie made by IBM research.
  • Participants share links to images and articles that depict atoms and molecules, further supporting the discussion on atomic visibility and existence.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on whether atoms can be seen or merely detected, with no clear consensus reached. Some agree on the importance of experimental evidence, while others challenge the framing of the question itself.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes references to various methods of imaging and detecting atoms, such as X-rays and quantum cameras, but does not resolve the complexities involved in these techniques or their implications for atomic theory.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying atomic theory, experimental physics, or anyone curious about the nature of matter and the methods used to explore it.

SF49erfan
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We "see" atoms by using tools to enhance our built-in senses. So "yes" we can see atoms etc. just like we can see anything that is invisible without some sort of equipment.

The picture we have of atoms and similar is a model built up over lots of observations over a long time with a variety of equipment - at each stage establishing what is going on.

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/can-see-atom/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeUmrK92ZIA
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AAAmelia said:
Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?

The existence of atoms involves MORE than just what you can (or cannot) see with your eyes! The accurate description of the atomic energy levels when compared to experiments is one VERY strong and compelling reasons why we know they exist the way we have understood it.

Zz.
 
Trave11er said:
Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.


Very cool. Thanks for posting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Trave11er said:
Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.


phinds said:
Very cool. Thanks for posting.

likewise
thankyou -- amazing what they can achieve these days

here's the longer video showing the making of the movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBpu4OPw6bM

Dave
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AAAmelia: Our theory of atoms took a long time to develop. There was evidence matter was made of atoms long before we could see them. Wikipedia has a short history which details some of the early evidence that persuaded people matter was made of atoms.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom#History

Perhaps skip any bits you don't understand.
 
ZapperZ said:
The existence of atoms involves MORE than just what you can (or cannot) see with your eyes!
I'd flip that over and say that in experimental sciences, very little (close to nothing) is based on what can be seen with our eyes.
 
  • #11
AAAmelia said:
Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?

probably better to ask can we detect atoms rather that can we see.
you do not need to see with your eyes to know something exists.
 
  • #12
Emilyjoint said:
probably better to ask can we detect atoms rather that can we see.
you do not need to see with your eyes to know something exists.

I have never seen the back of my neck bit I can be pretty certain it's there.
 
  • #13
X-rays are used to make images that show the positions of Atoms in crystals. X-rays are like light, em waves, so their images would be similar to light if it produced images.
 
  • #14
From OP's statistics page:
Last Activity: Aug12-13 11:53 PM
 
  • #15
sophiecentaur said:
I have never seen the back of my neck bit I can be pretty certain it's there.

Mirrors don't work for you? Maybe it's time to start a thread on experimental investigation of vampirism and related phenomena...

(In case it's not obvious... I'm poking fun at the thread not you :smile:)
 
  • #16
I don't believe in mirrors or CCTV.
 
  • #17
Mark44 said:
Starting a thread and never returning to it.

Hi guys - I don't mean to "hit and run" as you call it and I apologize if that is the traditional forum etiquette here to return to a thread to post afterwards.

I was quite busy with school and had forgotten to check back, but with my other threads I did actually read people's responses. I may not always post back, but I don't mean at all to imply that I was ungrateful for everyone's thoughts! It might just mean that I was either very busy and/or I may have read the responses and thought "Great!"

I guess sometimes I just think it's OK to not respond, since it might be a "waste" of people's time for me to just say, "AWESOME!" or something like that, but I shall try in the future here to at least let folks know I got their messages. I actually do genuinely appreciate people's thoughts and have learned some things from these forums. Thanks a bunch again!
 
  • #18
davenn said:
likewise
thankyou -- amazing what they can achieve these days

here's the longer video showing the making of the movie
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBpu4OPw6bM

Dave

I just watched both videos as well and they were very cool!

Neat how they used an existing atom(s) to move the still atom by getting them to chemically react in creating that movie!

As a follow-up question, do university chemistry/physics courses allow use of these super powerful "tools" for viewing atoms?
 
  • #19
AAAmelia said:
I guess sometimes I just think it's OK to not respond, since it might be a "waste" of people's time for me to just say, "AWESOME!" or something like that

That's what the "thanks" button is for :smile: :smile:
 
  • #20
Hi guys - I don't mean to "hit and run" as you call it and I apologize if that is the traditional forum etiquette here to return to a thread to post afterwards.

that's the etiquette of life, not just this forum :smile:

I guess sometimes I just think it's OK to not respond, since it might be a "waste" of people's time for me to just say, "AWESOME!" or something like that,

no that's just rude :wink:

its ALWAYS polite to acknowledge responses when a question is asked and answered

if you DONT answer how are we all to know that our posts helped you or not ??
it leaves us all wondering ... ummm wonder if he/she understood ??

happy New Year from Sydney, Australia

Dave
 
  • #21
Afaics, if the OP doesn't return after a page or two of thread then it's open season. The thing to do, if you really don't know much about the subject you post a question about, you should make that clear. If you are already half way there then I feel you should word the question appropriately (say, with some Maths). It's all too easy to give an answer that's way below or above what the OP wants and that can frustrate everyone.
I have read some excellent questions that start off "I am doing AS Physics and I have just come across a problem with the Photoelectric effect . . . . ." We all know where we stand then and the OP will probably have got the answer after a couple of responses.
 
  • #22
Trave11er said:
Somewhat relevant: the smallest movie in the world made by IBM research in spring 2013.


Thanks again for this video, Very cool.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #23
AAAmelia said:
Can we see atoms or other atomic stuff like electrons and protons, etc.? If not, how can we know they exist and how they behave?

There are some photos of atoms and molecules

29194901.jpg

triptych350.jpg

http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/inline/the-shape-of-atoms_1.jpg


http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21829194.900-smile-hydrogen-atom-youre-on-quantum-camera.html#.UsUzR41M84M

http://newscenter.berkeley.edu/2013/05/30/scientists-capture-first-images-of-molecules-before-and-after-reaction/

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-shape-of-atoms
 
  • #24
sophiecentaur said:
Afaics, if the OP doesn't return after a page or two of thread then it's open season. The thing to do, if you really don't know much about the subject you post a question about, you should make that clear. If you are already half way there then I feel you should word the question appropriately (say, with some Maths). It's all too easy to give an answer that's way below or above what the OP wants and that can frustrate everyone.
I have read some excellent questions that start off "I am doing AS Physics and I have just come across a problem with the Photoelectric effect . . . . ." We all know where we stand then and the OP will probably have got the answer after a couple of responses.

Makes sense! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
973
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
11K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K