Can We Use Huckel's Rule to Determine Aromaticity in 1,4-Benzoquinone?

  • Thread starter Thread starter warenzeichen
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion confirms that 1,4-Benzoquinone is not aromatic according to Huckel's rule, which requires a compound to have 4n + 2 pi electrons for aromaticity. The compound contains only 4 pi electrons, disqualifying it from being aromatic. Additionally, the presence of resonance structures, such as keto-enol tautomerism, complicates the analysis but ultimately supports the conclusion that the compound lacks aromatic characteristics. The discussion emphasizes that while Huckel's rule is a useful guideline, it can be misleading in certain cases.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Huckel's rule for aromaticity
  • Familiarity with resonance structures and tautomerism
  • Basic knowledge of molecular orbital (MO) theory
  • Experience with NMR spectroscopy and its application in determining molecular properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Huckel's rule in different molecular systems
  • Research the concept of keto-enol tautomerism and its effects on aromaticity
  • Learn about molecular orbital theory and its relation to resonance structures
  • Explore NMR spectroscopy techniques for analyzing aromatic compounds
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, organic chemists, and researchers interested in the principles of aromaticity and molecular structure analysis.

warenzeichen
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I am not sure how to use Huckel's rule to determine whether this compound is aromatic or not. It seems that inside the ring, there are only 4 pi electrons, and can the e- between C and oxygen move towards the ring?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
warenzeichen said:
can the e- between C and oxygen move towards the ring?

I'll give you a hint: They can't.
 
when we count the no of pi e- , don't we consider the "possible resonance" structure?
Also, can we say this is a "fully delocalized" system?
 
but for C=O , is it possible for us to draw as -C-O+ for prediction( although C is less electronegative than O)
for molecules with alternative resonance structure, do we need to consider all ?
 
Hueckels rule is derived from MO theory, why do you want to count resonance structures then?
 
so it is really inside the ring?
 
Certainly to some degree. But aromaticity is not a totally well defined concept and Hueckels rules can sometimes be misleading. What about a diamagnetic ring current? NMR shifts of the Carbons and Hydrogens? Are there any experimental results?
 
I wasn't anticipated to use extensive mathematics to explain simple molecules in intermediate organic chemistry courses. I think Huckel's rule is sufficient to explain them. But there are tautomers / one of the resonance structures . Hence, it is important to consider the structure to see if one of them got aromaticity in one structure (e.g. keto-enol tautomerism)


anyway, the compound is not aromatic.
 
  • #10
warenzeichen said:
I wasn't anticipated to use extensive mathematics to explain simple molecules in intermediate organic chemistry courses. I think Huckel's rule is sufficient to explain them. But there are tautomers / one of the resonance structures . Hence, it is important to consider the structure to see if one of them got aromaticity in one structure (e.g. keto-enol tautomerism)


anyway, the compound is not aromatic.

If you were to produce the correct tautomer, you would have a zwitterion where the formal charges were on the oxygens. In that case the ring itself would be aromatic. But if you consider the ground state, it isn't. That zwitterion is waay higher in energy than the rather modest aromatic stabilization energy you get as a result of shuffling the electrons into just the right locations.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
62K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
834
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K