Can Weight Ratio Be Used to Solve Area Problems in Engineering?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter maskerwsk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of cross-sectional areas for a bi-metal tape, specifically focusing on the geometry of a domed part. Participants explore whether weight ratios can be used as a method for solving area problems in engineering contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks assistance in calculating the area of a domed shape, providing dimensions and a taper angle.
  • Another participant questions the consistency of the provided dimensions, suggesting that the numbers do not add up and asking for clarification on the circular part's measurements.
  • A later reply confirms the dimensions and clarifies that the circular arc is a segment from a circle with a 9.00 mm radius.
  • One participant proposes a mathematical approach involving quadratics to solve for the height and area of the curved part.
  • Another participant suggests an alternative method of using weight ratios to determine area ratios, arguing that it may be simpler than finding analytical formulas for arbitrary shapes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the best approach to solve the area problem, with some favoring analytical methods and others advocating for weight ratio comparisons. There is no consensus on the most effective method to use.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential inconsistencies in the provided dimensions, indicating that further clarification may be needed to accurately solve the problem. The discussion remains focused on the geometry and calculations involved without resolving the discrepancies.

maskerwsk
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, hope I am posting in the correct place.

At work I am creating a excel spreadsheet that will work out the cross sectional areas of a manufactured bi metal tape'.
And i can't figure out the domed part.

ive uploaded an image of the shape that needs calculating.

any idea if it can be done or does it require more infomation?

Thanks.
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
These are quite troubling problems. Are you expecting exact answers, or approximations?
Anyway, I believe I could flesh out the first problem because it does have enough information, but for the second, you've got the circular part labelled as 9.00, while the angle it makes at the end is 7o, but the "diameter" is 3.36.
How is it possible that the circular part is 9.00 (or is that counting the slanted edges as well?), but even so, if we made the slanted edges and circular part longer by turning the figure into a rectangle with length 3.36 and height 0.50, then all edges excluding the bottom will add to 4.36, which is much less than 9.00, so your numbers just don't add up.
 
i was hoping for exact answers.
im not sure why you think the numbers don't add up.

the tape is 3.36mm wide with an overall height of 0.50mm there is a taper of 7° (either side) and a radius of 9.00mm

we produce this tape at work millions of times aday and many others relativly similar.

if you could figure out the top problem that would be great as i could use that and subtract that area from a theoretical trapezoid (factoring out the radius of the tape)

hope that makes sense, I've uploaded another drawing if not :)
 

Attachments

Last edited:
So, just to make this clear:
The circular arc is a segment from a circle with a 9.00 mm radius?
 
arildno said:
So, just to make this clear:
The circular arc is a segment from a circle with a 9.00 mm radius?

exactly :)
 
First problem:
(W+h tan(θ))2+(R-h)2=R2
You can turn that into a quadratic in h and solve.
Second problem:
Consider one end of the curved part. Let X be its horizontal distance from the centre line and Y be its height above the base line.
X = W/2 -Y tan(θ)
R2 = X2 + (Y+R-H)2
From those, get a quadratic in X or Y and solve.
Let the angle the arc subtends at the centre of its circle be 2ψ.
Cos(ψ) = (Y+R-H)/R
Solve for ψ.
Area = ψR2-R2sin(ψ)cos(ψ)+2XY+Y2 tan(θ)
 
BTW:
I don't see why an engineer would bother with finding analytical formulae for arbitrary area shapes.
A much simpler approach in general would be to work out the area ratio of two pieces of the same material by calculating their weight ratio. By controlling the area of one of the pieces, you'll readily find the other.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
38K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K