Can You Calculate the Mass of a Water Molecule Using Avogadro's Number?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The mass of a water molecule can be calculated using Avogadro's number and the molar mass of water. The molar mass of water is 18.02 grams per mole, derived from the atomic masses of hydrogen (1.01 g) and oxygen (16 g). By dividing the molar mass by Avogadro's number (6.02 x 1023 molecules/mole), the mass of a single water molecule is determined to be approximately 3.0 x 10-23 grams. This calculation confirms the necessity of knowing the molar mass to accurately compute the mass of individual molecules.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Avogadro's number (6.02 x 1023 molecules/mole)
  • Knowledge of molar mass calculations
  • Familiarity with periodic table of elements
  • Basic chemistry concepts, including molecular composition of water (H2O)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the calculation of molar mass for different compounds
  • Learn about the significance of Avogadro's number in chemistry
  • Explore the concept of isotopes and their impact on molar mass
  • Study Clapeyron's equation and its applications in thermodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, educators, and anyone interested in molecular calculations and the properties of water.

Kamataat
Messages
137
Reaction score
0
Is there any way to find the mass of a water molecule when only Avogadro's number is given?

Thanks!

- Kamataat
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think I got it!

The mass of one mole of water = 18 grams.

Avogadro's = 6.02x10^23 molecules/mole


18gms/mole divided by 6.02x10^23 molecules/mole should work, if my chemistry isn't too rusty. The mole units will cancel each other, leaving you with units of gms/molecule.

Should get something like 3x10^-23 gm/molecule. Actually a little less, since I rounded all numbers off.

Please correct me (anyone) if I am incorrect!

Good luck.

Steve
 
Yeah, that's how I'd do it, but I was asking because of the stupid exercise book. It gives all sorts of extra info in the back, in case it's required to solve a problem, but it doesn't give any molar masses. So I thought that maybe there's a clever way to solve this w/o the molar mass.

All I know is Avogadro's number, the definition of a mole (# of atoms in 0.012kg of C^{12}) and Clapeyron's equation.

Thanks anyway!

- Kamataat
 
The easiest way to figure out the molar mass is to look at a pereodic table of elements...Off the top of my head, two hydrogen(1.01) and one oxygen(16), you just add those and get the molar mass.

Am I missing something...?
 
No, that definitely should be what you do. Most problems just don't give molar masses for things like water, carbon dioxide, etc. in some chemistry books because the value is given so many times over that it becomes one of those redundant things.

Given only avogadro's number, you definitely need to have the molar mass to find the number of molecules.
 
The average molar mass for an element is given on any periodic table, and certain isotopes can be looked up. Water is 2 hydrogens (1.01 each) and one oxygen (16) which gives 16 + 2(1.01) = 18.02 g/mol.

\left(\frac{18.02 g}{1 mol}\right) \left(\frac{1 mol}{6.02 \times 10^{23} molecules}\right) = \left(\frac{ x grams}{ 1 molecule }\right)
 
Smith basically used this then multiplied by one mole then divided by one mole.
 
Thanks everyone for making this clear for me!

- Kamataat
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
831
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K