Can you do sum of all moments on a point that's not a rotational axis?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion addresses the feasibility of calculating the sum of all moments about a point that is not a rotational axis, specifically in the context of static analysis of structures. It confirms that moments can be taken about any point in a plane or any line in 3D, although some points may be more practical than others. The conversation emphasizes the importance of selecting reference points wisely, as using point A for moment calculations eliminates its contribution to the sum of moments. Additionally, it highlights that while wires can carry tension loads, they are not effective under moments or torques.

PREREQUISITES
  • Static equilibrium principles
  • Understanding of moments and torque
  • Basic structural analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of tension loads in wires
NEXT STEPS
  • Study static equilibrium equations in structural analysis
  • Learn about calculating moments in 3D structures
  • Explore the properties of tension and compression in structural elements
  • Investigate methods for finding centroids of irregular shapes
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and anyone involved in static analysis of structures will benefit from this discussion.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
Can you do "sum of all moments" on a point that's not a rotational axis?

For instance, in this structure, with the two wires holding the beam

http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/3687/twowiresj.jpg

Can I do sum of all moments on B? Or is it not allowed because it's not a pivot point?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


You can take moments about any point in a plane or any line in 3D.

Some are more useful than others. We usually try to eliminate the effects of one or more external load by taking moments about a point or line that the line of external load passes through.
 


Can I even take a sum of all moments on a wire?
 


It depends on what you are looking for. Wires are good at carrying tension loads, but they tend to kink when subjected to moments or torques.

Although you have not stated a full problem, it appears that you have been asked to do a static analysis of this structure, to determine the tension in the wires given the weight of the rod and the magnitude of the applied load F. In addition to the tension, there will be a reaction at A, the nature of which will depend on whether A is fixed or pinned in some manner.

Hint: When writing your equations of static equilibrium, if you use point A as the reference point for moment calculations, then the reaction force at point A will not contribute to the sum of the moments, because the moment arm from A to A equals 0. You will, however, obtain a moment expression involving T, W, and F, with W and F being known. This makes it easier to substitute for T in the other equation of static equilibrium involving just the summation of forces.
 


Femme_physics said:
Can I even take a sum of all moments on a wire?

As Studiot already said: "You can take moments about any point in a plane or any line in 3D."

So yes, you can take the sum of moments on a wire.
You can even take the sum of moments somewhere in thin air, although that will usually not be very useful. :wink:

You may also note his careful distinction of a plane and of 3D.
In 3D you're actually always taking the sum of moments with respect to a line.
 


You can even take the sum of moments somewhere in thin air, although that will usually not be very useful.

When you are finding the centroid of an odd shaped object such as an L shape or the letter O you will find that the centroid actually is in thin air.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K