Can you prove a theorem from Bergmann chapter 8 using Fig. 8?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter supakorn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a theorem presented in Bergmann chapter 8, specifically utilizing a figure referenced in the text. The scope includes theoretical exploration and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Homework-related, Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant requests assistance in proving a theorem from Bergmann chapter 8 using a specific figure.
  • Another participant suggests that the inquiry resembles a homework problem and asks about the participant's previous attempts and the properties of the variable \varphi.
  • A different participant clarifies that their inquiry is not homework-related and notes that \varphi is skew-symmetric.
  • A later reply indicates that the participant has completed their proof but expresses uncertainty, mentioning that \varphi is defined on flat space and that they will share their answer later.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus, as there are differing views on whether the inquiry is homework-related and varying levels of confidence in the proof being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the properties of \varphi and the completeness of the proof mentioned by the participant who claims to have finished their work.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in theoretical physics, particularly those studying Bergmann's work or exploring skew-symmetric functions in mathematical contexts.

supakorn
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
From Bergmann chapter 8.Please show that (see at Fig. below)...thank you.
 

Attachments

  • B1.GIF
    B1.GIF
    1.1 KB · Views: 462
  • B2.GIF
    B2.GIF
    995 bytes · Views: 479
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like a homework problem.
What have you tried?
What is [tex]\varphi[/tex]? Does it have any special properties?
 
it not HW but i read and try to prove.For PHI, it is a skewsymmetric.
 
I'm Done (but Not Sure).phi Defined On The Flat Space,i Will Post My Answer Next Time.now I'm Happy.
 

Similar threads

Graduate Assumptions of Hawking-Penrose 1970 Singularity Theorem
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
Graduate Solving this non-holonomic system using Dirac-Bergmann theory
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Graduate Dirac's "GTR" Eq (27.4): how momentum ##p^\mu## varies
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
Undergrad Noether's second theorem: two questions
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Studying Skipping Chapters in Stewart’s Calculus? (Pearson's Edexcel IAL Background)
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Graduate Confused about noise power spectral density measurement
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
High School Have I proved some part of Fermat's last theorem?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Graduate Landau-Lifshitz pseudotensor - expressing the EM tensor ##T^{ik}##
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Graduate Can We Flatten Space with York Decomposition?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Textbook 'The Physics of Waves': Calculating Work Done by Force
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K