MHB Can you prove the following two difficult trigonometric identities?

DrLiangMath
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Can you prove the following?

[sec(x)]^6 - [tan(x)]^6 = 1 + 3*[tan(x)]^2*[sec(x)]^2

[sin(x)]^2*tan(x) + [cos(x)]^2*cot(x) + 2*sin(x)*cos(x) = tan(x) + cot(x)

If not, the following free math tutoring video shows you the method:

 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
@Dr. Liang: We have a LaTeX compiler here that you can use to type out the equations. If you don't know LaTeX reply to this to see how the coding works. The basics are simple and we have a Forum to show you how to do more complicated work.
[math]sec^6(x) - tan^6(x) = 1 + 3 ~tan^2(x) ~ sec^2(x)[/math]

[math]sin^2(x) ~ tan(x) + cos^2(x) ~ cot(x) + 2 ~ sin(x) ~ cos(x) = tan(x) + cot(x)[/math]

-Dan
 
Hello Dan,

Thank you so much for your kindness and help! I didn't notice a LaTeX compiler is available in the forum.

Derek
 
This is useful information
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top