MHB Can You Solve for Tension and Force in Static Equilibrium for a Boom?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for tension and force in a static equilibrium scenario involving a boom and a hanging weight. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the setup, particularly the role of angles and trigonometry in decomposing forces. They suggest starting with rotational equilibrium about the hinge and then applying equations for translational equilibrium in both vertical and horizontal directions. Clarification on the diagram and the reaction force vector at the hinge is also highlighted as crucial for solving the problem. Engaging with responses is encouraged to track progress on the problem-solving process.
cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
The uniform boom shown below weighs 668 N, and the object hanging from its right end weighs 386 N. The boom is supported by a light cable and by a hinge at the wall.

Calculate the tension in the cable and the force by the hinge on the boom (both in N). (Enter the magnitudes.)

Tension in the cable Nforce by the hinge N

View attachment 7603

Need help setting up the problem correctly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm not real clear on your drawing. Is the "boom" the horizontal piece that doesn't seem to attach?

Typically, you use the available angles and some trigonometry to decompose to the vertical and horizontal pieces and use this information to understand the state of equilibrium. Can you find a Stationary Point, around which such a consideration can be based?
 
Hopefully, the attached diagram is correct ... note the reaction force vector, R , at the hinge is not sketched in since the direction of its y-component is unknown (but it can be determined once the tension, T , is found)

https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/7614

I would start with rotational equilibrium about the hinge ...

$\displaystyle \sum \tau = 0$

... then continue with the two equations for translational equilibrium

$\displaystyle \sum F_y = 0$

$\displaystyle \sum F_x = 0$oh ... how about responding to your threads once in a while to let us know if you solved the problem (or not).
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K