Statics: Problem about Equilibrium in 3-dimensions

  • #1
183
2

Homework Statement



The two uniform rectangular plates each weighing 800 kg are freely hinged about their common edge and suspended by the central cable and four symmetrical corner cables. Calculate the tension T in each of the corner cables and the tension T0 in the center cable.
Plate Assembly.jpg

All dimensions in the figure are in meters.


2. Homework Equations

The scalar force equilibrium equations in three mutually perpendicular directions x-,y- and z-,i.e,

ΣFx=0 ΣFy=0 and ΣFz=0

The scalar moment equilibrium equations about three mutually perpendicular axes through a point,i.e,

ΣMx=0 ΣMy=0 and ΣMz=0[/B]


The Attempt at a Solution



The Free Body Diagram of the plate assembly is drawn below along with the choice of the coordinate axes.
FBD of Plate Assembly.jpg

The tensions in the corner cables 'T' can be resolved into its horizontal and vertical components as Txy and Tz respectively.The horizontal component Txy can then be resolved into components along x- and y- directions as Tx and Ty respectively in the x-y plane.The angles which orient the line of action of a corner cable tension T can be determined as illustrated in the figure below.
Force Resolution Geometry.jpg


The force equilibrium equations in the x- and y- directions are already satisfied since the identical x- and y- components of all the corner cable tensions cancel each other.

The force equilibrium equation in the z-direction yields,

ΣFz=0

⇒4Tsinα+T0-2.800(9.81)=0

⇒4T.##\frac {5}{\sqrt {46}}##+T0=15696

⇒2.95T+T0=15696

The moment equilibrium equation about the x-axis through O gives,

ΣMx=0

⇒2Tsinα(6)+T0(3)-2.800(9.81)(3)=0

⇒12T.##\frac {5}{\sqrt {46}}##+3T0=47088

⇒8.85T+3T0=47088

This is the same equation as obtained from ΣFz=0.

The moment equilibrium equation about the y-axis through O gives,

ΣMy=0

⇒ -2Tsinα(2##\sqrt {12}##)+800(9.81)(##\sqrt {12}##+##\frac {\sqrt {12}} {2}##)-T0(##\sqrt {12}##)+800(9.81)(##\frac {\sqrt {12}} {2}##)=0

-2T.##\frac {5} {\sqrt {46}}##.(2##\sqrt {12}##)+800(9.81)(##\sqrt {12}##+##\frac {\sqrt {12}} {2}##+##\frac {\sqrt {12}} {2}##) -T0(##\sqrt {12}##)=0

⇒ 10.22T+##\sqrt {12}##T0=54372.5
which is again the same equation as obtained before.

The moment equilibrium equation about the z-axis through O is already satisfied.
So as it is evident the equations of equilibrium are resulting into a single equation in T and T0.We need at least two dissimilar equations in T and T0 to solve for T and T0.

Where is the problem?
[/B]
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2020 Award
36,416
6,946
Where is the problem?
All of your equations would still be true if the pair plates were to form a single rigid body. You need one which depends on their being hinged.
 
  • #3
183
2
All of your equations would still be true if the pair plates were to form a single rigid body. You need one which depends on their being hinged.
I had a thought about this approach earlier when a couple of things pushed me into doubts.Firstly,if we treat the two plates hinged together separately as two different bodies should we consider the effect of the centre cable on both the plates?

Secondly,if instead of being hinged together about their common edge the plates were welded together to form the assembly as shown(so that they could be treated as a single rigid body) would it be possible to determine the values of the tensions in that case using the conditions for static equilibrium?
 

Related Threads on Statics: Problem about Equilibrium in 3-dimensions

  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
720
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
15K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Top