High School Can you turn a skyscraper into a magnet?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sir John Galt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet
Click For Summary
Creating an electromagnetic field around a skyscraper by running current through its structural members is conceptually possible but impractical due to high resistance at joint connections and the need for separate power supplies for each floor. The discussion explores the idea of using this field to ionize nitrogen in the air, potentially producing tritium, a radioactive byproduct. Concerns are raised about the feasibility of generating such a powerful magnetic field and the implications of controlled versus uncontrolled demolitions on the process. The conversation highlights skepticism about achieving nuclear changes through ionization via magnetic fields. Overall, the concept raises significant scientific and practical challenges.
Sir John Galt
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR
Assistance with conceptualizing stupid question greatly appreciated.....
Curious to know if possible to create an electromagnetic field around a skyscraper if you run sufficient current through the structural members (ie interconnected column and beam network).

Thanks in advance to any takers...
 
  • Like
Likes InkTide and Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

AC or DC ?
Either way, every floor will need to be driven with a separate supply, so the columns are equipotentials.

There will be big problems due to high resistance at the joints where the beams are joined. Either the beam was painted to protect it from the weather, or it is now rusty.

It is conceptually possible, but not practical. Why might you want to do that ?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Thanks Baluncore, and my apologies for delayed response.

It's primarily a conceptual question relating to magnetic fields and the effects of compression of this magnetic field.

Lets say I have a 150 ft skyscraper and am looking to apply a electromagnetic field that would ionize Nitrogen in the air, one of the byproducts being Tritium (for which the decay looks low energy). Normally cosmic radiation (low intensity high velocity) produces this substance in nature, but I'm curious if a lower frequency and high intensity would result in same (except more of it). Besides the possibility of creating this radioactive biproduct of the ionization, let's say the structure then undergoes a controlled demolition.

As the height of the building compresses, does the same occur with the magnetic fields frequency? Creating even more tritium? I wasn't sure if the potential energy of the field at a given height would be converted in that manner...
 
Sir John Galt said:
ionize Nitrogen in the air, one of the byproducts being Tritium
Wait, what? A chemical interaction (ionization) resulting in a nuclear change?!

But you're not doing that with a cosmic ray gamma. Or an electrostatic field. You're going to do it with a magnetic field?! Wow, that's one powerful magnetic field you've imagined.

I do not think that a controlled demolition is a problem that you need to worry about. An uncontrolled demolition is certain.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
Building an implosion bomb to demolish a skyscraper is not going to be an easy way to make tritium. We already have too many nuclear weapons on Earth today.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and bob012345
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
515
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K