B Can you turn a skyscraper into a magnet?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sir John Galt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet
AI Thread Summary
Creating an electromagnetic field around a skyscraper by running current through its structural members is conceptually possible but impractical due to high resistance at joint connections and the need for separate power supplies for each floor. The discussion explores the idea of using this field to ionize nitrogen in the air, potentially producing tritium, a radioactive byproduct. Concerns are raised about the feasibility of generating such a powerful magnetic field and the implications of controlled versus uncontrolled demolitions on the process. The conversation highlights skepticism about achieving nuclear changes through ionization via magnetic fields. Overall, the concept raises significant scientific and practical challenges.
Sir John Galt
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Assistance with conceptualizing stupid question greatly appreciated.....
Curious to know if possible to create an electromagnetic field around a skyscraper if you run sufficient current through the structural members (ie interconnected column and beam network).

Thanks in advance to any takers...
 
  • Like
Likes InkTide and Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

AC or DC ?
Either way, every floor will need to be driven with a separate supply, so the columns are equipotentials.

There will be big problems due to high resistance at the joints where the beams are joined. Either the beam was painted to protect it from the weather, or it is now rusty.

It is conceptually possible, but not practical. Why might you want to do that ?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Thanks Baluncore, and my apologies for delayed response.

It's primarily a conceptual question relating to magnetic fields and the effects of compression of this magnetic field.

Lets say I have a 150 ft skyscraper and am looking to apply a electromagnetic field that would ionize Nitrogen in the air, one of the byproducts being Tritium (for which the decay looks low energy). Normally cosmic radiation (low intensity high velocity) produces this substance in nature, but I'm curious if a lower frequency and high intensity would result in same (except more of it). Besides the possibility of creating this radioactive biproduct of the ionization, let's say the structure then undergoes a controlled demolition.

As the height of the building compresses, does the same occur with the magnetic fields frequency? Creating even more tritium? I wasn't sure if the potential energy of the field at a given height would be converted in that manner...
 
Sir John Galt said:
ionize Nitrogen in the air, one of the byproducts being Tritium
Wait, what? A chemical interaction (ionization) resulting in a nuclear change?!

But you're not doing that with a cosmic ray gamma. Or an electrostatic field. You're going to do it with a magnetic field?! Wow, that's one powerful magnetic field you've imagined.

I do not think that a controlled demolition is a problem that you need to worry about. An uncontrolled demolition is certain.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
Building an implosion bomb to demolish a skyscraper is not going to be an easy way to make tritium. We already have too many nuclear weapons on Earth today.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and bob012345
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
I passed a motorcycle on the highway going the opposite direction. I know I was doing 125/km/h. I estimated that the frequency of his motor dropped by an entire octave, so that's a doubling of the wavelength. My intuition is telling me that's extremely unlikely. I can't actually calculate how fast he was going with just that information, can I? It seems to me, I have to know the absolute frequency of one of those tones, either shifted up or down or unshifted, yes? I tried to mimic the...
Back
Top