B Can you turn a skyscraper into a magnet?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sir John Galt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magnet
AI Thread Summary
Creating an electromagnetic field around a skyscraper by running current through its structural members is conceptually possible but impractical due to high resistance at joint connections and the need for separate power supplies for each floor. The discussion explores the idea of using this field to ionize nitrogen in the air, potentially producing tritium, a radioactive byproduct. Concerns are raised about the feasibility of generating such a powerful magnetic field and the implications of controlled versus uncontrolled demolitions on the process. The conversation highlights skepticism about achieving nuclear changes through ionization via magnetic fields. Overall, the concept raises significant scientific and practical challenges.
Sir John Galt
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
TL;DR Summary
Assistance with conceptualizing stupid question greatly appreciated.....
Curious to know if possible to create an electromagnetic field around a skyscraper if you run sufficient current through the structural members (ie interconnected column and beam network).

Thanks in advance to any takers...
 
  • Like
Likes InkTide and Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

AC or DC ?
Either way, every floor will need to be driven with a separate supply, so the columns are equipotentials.

There will be big problems due to high resistance at the joints where the beams are joined. Either the beam was painted to protect it from the weather, or it is now rusty.

It is conceptually possible, but not practical. Why might you want to do that ?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
Thanks Baluncore, and my apologies for delayed response.

It's primarily a conceptual question relating to magnetic fields and the effects of compression of this magnetic field.

Lets say I have a 150 ft skyscraper and am looking to apply a electromagnetic field that would ionize Nitrogen in the air, one of the byproducts being Tritium (for which the decay looks low energy). Normally cosmic radiation (low intensity high velocity) produces this substance in nature, but I'm curious if a lower frequency and high intensity would result in same (except more of it). Besides the possibility of creating this radioactive biproduct of the ionization, let's say the structure then undergoes a controlled demolition.

As the height of the building compresses, does the same occur with the magnetic fields frequency? Creating even more tritium? I wasn't sure if the potential energy of the field at a given height would be converted in that manner...
 
Sir John Galt said:
ionize Nitrogen in the air, one of the byproducts being Tritium
Wait, what? A chemical interaction (ionization) resulting in a nuclear change?!

But you're not doing that with a cosmic ray gamma. Or an electrostatic field. You're going to do it with a magnetic field?! Wow, that's one powerful magnetic field you've imagined.

I do not think that a controlled demolition is a problem that you need to worry about. An uncontrolled demolition is certain.
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
Building an implosion bomb to demolish a skyscraper is not going to be an easy way to make tritium. We already have too many nuclear weapons on Earth today.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and bob012345
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top