Can You Verify My Equations for Rocket Flight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter strive
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Altitude Rocket
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on verifying a set of equations for rocket flight, specifically aimed at calculating final altitude based on various parameters such as fuel mass, payload, and thrust. The user employs MATLAB/Octave for iterative calculations at 1-second intervals, comparing results with the Tsiolkovsky equation. Key concerns include the accuracy of drag coefficients and the need for a more detailed aerodynamic model, with suggestions to use OpenRocket and RASaero for improved simulations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rocket propulsion principles, including thrust and drag.
  • Familiarity with MATLAB/Octave programming for iterative calculations.
  • Knowledge of atmospheric conditions and their impact on flight dynamics.
  • Basic grasp of supersonic aerodynamics and drag coefficient calculations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the use of OpenRocket for validating rocket flight simulations.
  • Investigate RASaero for accurate drag coefficient estimations across various speeds.
  • Study the book "Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective" by J.D. Anderson for insights into supersonic aerodynamics.
  • Research the concept of drag coefficient versus Mach number curves for enhanced aerodynamic accuracy.
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, rocket scientists, and hobbyists involved in model rocketry who seek to optimize flight performance and accuracy in simulations.

strive
Messages
51
Reaction score
4
Hi

I have written a set of equations for rocket flight (below) as i need to know the final altitude at various configurations (fuel mass/payload/exhaust mass flow/thrust).

I would ask if someone can please verify if this is correct (i have compared the results to results gained from Tsiolkovsky equation but it is difficult to approximate varying Isp with altitude and to include drag). Although the results are near.
I am calculating iteratively because i need to know the following parameters at 1 second intervals: vehicle velocity, acceleration, altitude and mass.

I know i should be using natural logarithm for mass ratios, but at 100 steps per second i postulated the error is negligible (a max error of 2% is allowed).
The equations in question are blue, the rest is just the programs structure (it's matlab/octave syntax).

Atmospheric conditions for each iteration are derived by a large number of equations which i have already verified thus i have not included them.m0=1100; % initial rocket mass [kg/s]
masso=500; % initial oxidator mass [kg]
massouto=6; % oxidator consumption [kg/s]
massoutg=1.5; % fuel consumption [kg/s]
massout=massouto+massoutg; % total propellant consumption [kg/s]

flightdur=(masso)/massouto % time of powered flight
t=0.01; % timestep

Rmax=0.826; % max vessel radius [m]
A=pi*Rmax^2; % max vessel cross-section [m2]
R=287; % air gas constant [J/kgK]
h0=0; % starting altitude [m]
T0=288.15; % temperature at 0m isa [K]
v0=0; % starting velocity [m/s]
g=9.81; % starting gravitational acceleration [m/s^2]

Cd1=0.015; % subsonic drag coefficient [/]
Cd2=0.04; % supersonic drag coefficient [/]


Xtotal=flightdur/t; % total number of timesteps [/]
% START CONDITIONS--------------------------------------------------------------
m=m0;
s=h0;
v=v0;

% TIMESTEP EQUATION BLOCK-------------------------------------------------------
for i=1:Xtotal
TIME=t*i;

%%% CALCULATION OF ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS (also defines vout)
(vout % exhaust gas velocity [m/s])

F=vout*massout; % generated thrust [N]
ro=p/(R*T); % ambient density [kg/m^3]


if v<340
Fd=A*v^2*ro*Cd1/2; % subsonic flight drag [N]
else
Fd=A*v^2*ro*Cd2/2; % supersonic drag [N]
end

Fu=F-Fd; % useful thrust [N]

dm=(massout*t); % mass change in timestep X [kg]
ma=m-(dm/2); % average mass during timestep X [kg]
a=(Fu/ma)-g; % acceleration in timestep X [m/s^2]
s=(a*(t^2)/2)+v*t+s; % altitude in timestep X [m]
v=(a*t)+v; % velocity at the end of timestep X [m/s]
m=m-dm; % vehicle mass at the end of timestep X [kg]

end

%%% COASTING PERIOD--------------------------------------------------------
ii=0;

while v>0

ii=ii+1;
TIMEcoasting=ii*t;

%%% CALCULATION OF ATMOSPHERIC CONDITIONS

ro=p/(R*T); % ambient density [kg/m^3]

if v<340
Fd=A*v^2*ro*Cd1/2; % subsonic flight drag [N]
else
Fd=A*v^2*ro*Cd2/2; % supersonic drag [N]
end

a=-(Fd/massempty)-g; % acceleration in timestep X [m/s^2]
s=(a*(t^2)/2)+v*t+s; % altitude in timestep X [m]
v=(a*t)+v; % velocity at the end of timestep X [m/s]


end

Thank you for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps you can use OpenRocket [1] to check your results. You may have to select "model rocketry" parameters for this to be accurate.

[1] http://openrocket.sourceforge.net
 
Those drag coefficients look perhaps an order of magnitude too low to me, and you'll lose a significant amount of accuracy by only having a subsonic and supersonic value, instead of a CD vs mach curve. If you want a more realistic aerodynamic simulation, RASaero is pretty good at estimating rocket drag all the way up to pretty high supersonic speed.

http://www.rasaero.com/
 
Thank you both.

I will test both programs.

I have checked the NACA RM A53D02 (from the RASAero site) now and it really seems the coefficients are way too low (i migth have used the planform area drag coefficients instead of frontal area drag coefficients).

By the way, can you perhaps guide me to some condensed reading on supersonic aerodynamics? I seem to be unable to find any »to the point« books.
 
strive said:
By the way, can you perhaps guide me to some condensed reading on supersonic aerodynamics? I seem to be unable to find any »to the point« books.

Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective - J.D. Anderson
Elements of Gasdynamics - Liepmann and Roshko
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K