Can You Wire Bond Low Ductility Materials Successfully?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges and techniques associated with wire bonding low ductility materials such as Chromel, Manganin, and Konstantan. Participants explore various factors influencing successful bonding, including pad temperature, pressure, power, and the choice of materials. The conversation touches on both theoretical and practical aspects of bonding in experimental settings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the feasibility of wire bonding low ductility materials and the key factors for success, such as pad temperature and pressure.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the ability to bond materials like Manganin, suggesting that gold and Al-Si are the only "easy" options.
  • A participant mentions a friend's wire bonder manual indicating that bonding Konstantan is "hard to do."
  • There is a discussion about the compatibility of different materials for bonding, noting that certain combinations work better than others, such as bonding Al wire to gold pads.
  • One participant shares a method involving epoxy and carbon probes for bonding high nickel wires, emphasizing the need for a specific power source.
  • Another participant references studies by K&S on copper bonding, suggesting that uniform intermetallic formation is crucial for bond strength, which may be more challenging with alloys.
  • There is a debate about the use of heat in bonding processes, with some arguing that heat can alter surface chemistry and properties, while others assert that thermosonic bonding is effective.
  • One participant notes that Al wire works on many materials except copper, which requires Au wire for bonding.
  • A participant expresses confidence that heat below 1000°C is acceptable and raises concerns about soldering issues due to surface tension with thin wires.
  • Questions arise about the feasibility of using carbon probes with small diameters and the necessity of working in an Argon environment to prevent burning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of skepticism and exploration regarding the bonding of low ductility materials, with no consensus reached on the best methods or materials. Multiple competing views on the effectiveness of various bonding techniques and conditions remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the specific conditions required for successful bonding, the dependence on material combinations, and the unresolved nature of certain technical claims regarding bonding processes.

0xDEADBEEF
Messages
815
Reaction score
1
Did anyone here ever successfully wire bond Chromel, Manganin, Konstantan or some other such material with low ductility? What is the key to success here? Pad temperature? Pressure? Power? Is gold still the best pad material? I heard also the needle makes a difference?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
"Bond" as in using e.g. Manganin as a bond wire?
I doubt that is possible, the only materials that are "easy" to bond are -as far as I know- gold and Al-Si

I have colllegues that sometimes "glue" other types of wire using silver paste, but that is quite messy,
 
A friend told me that his wire bonder manual listing different wire materials, had the remark "hard to do" written next to Konstantan.
 
Are you sure he didn't mean materials you can bond TO?
Bonding is a bit tricky in that only certain combinations of material work well together, it is e.g. easy to bond to a gold pad using Al wire; but it is impossible to bond TO an aluminium pad using Au wire (due to the fact that the Au can't break the oxide).

Also, the shape of the wedge/ball makes a huge difference which is why there are special wedges/balls for Al and Au (you can't bond Al using an Au wedge). Hence, not only would you have to find the right wire you would also need the right type of wedge...
 
I was in the instrumentation business for years and we had to bond high nickel wires on a regular basis. One way is to epoxy your copper wire nearby such that your stripped end of the copper is held in place. Wrap your high nickle wire about the end of the copper wire, and melt the two together using a carbon probe.

The probe is nothing speacial, in fact it can be quite large. However, the power source has to right. You want a current limited power supply with a fairly high open circuit voltage ( maybe 60 volts? ).

I don't recall the rest, that was out of my area, but I suspect you could work it out with a lab supply and few hours.
 
K&S has some information on studies they did for copper bonding. I don't think they cover the alloys you mention but the process considerations would be similar:

http://www.kns.com/KNS07/Templates/showpage.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&TMID=111&FID=549&PID=976

You normally want a uniform intermetallic formation between the wire and pad for good bond strength. I'm guessing that may be more difficult with alloys.

f95toli said:
Are you sure he didn't mean materials you can bond TO?
Bonding is a bit tricky in that only certain combinations of material work well together, it is e.g. easy to bond to a gold pad using Al wire; but it is impossible to bond TO an aluminium pad using Au wire (due to the fact that the Au can't break the oxide).

I think you said it backwards. Thermosonic gold wire bonded to aluminum pads is common. I think the heat and ultrasonic energy is sufficient to break the oxide.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
davidrit said:
I think you said it backwards. Thermosonic gold wire bonded to aluminum pads is common. I think the heat and ultrasonic energy is sufficient to break the oxide.

No, but I do think we are referring to somewhat different things. I don't know of anyone who actually uses heat while bonding "research" samples; simply because if it hot enough to modify the surface chemistry it might also change the properties of the sample (remember that we are talking about an uncontrolled atmosphere here, at least for normal manual bonders). The heater on the sample stage is generally only used to keep the sample a few degrees about RT to avoid having moisture condensing on it.

Anyway, the main point here is that I was talking about bonding using ONLY the ultrasonic (since I sort of assumed that is what Deadbeef was referring to), in which case bonding gold to Al is if not impossible so at least extremely difficult, it is at least not possible on the manual K&S bonders I use most of the time.

It is interesting to not that Al wire works on almost everything (I use it on Al, Nb, Au, Sn etc) except copper. I am not sure why, but whenever I have to bond to copper I have to use Au wire instead (which of course doesn't work on Al, Nb, Sn...).
 
Thank you for the Tips so far. Heat is not a problem at all. Anything below 1000°C should be fine.

The wires as well as the substrate have thicknesses of about 30\mu m Soldering causes problems because of the surface tension which produces .3mm thick balls even on the .1mm soldering iron tips. Fixating the wires is hard on those dimensions too. Normal spot welders don't work with wires this thin and would also break the substrate.

Maye the carbon probes are an answer. If I understand correctly it is just a very hot tip of carbon. Do these exist with tiny diameters? Do I have to work in an Argon box so the tip doesn't burn?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
15K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K