MHB Canceling fractions when more than 1 variable in an equation

neurohype
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
EDIT: If you're reading this and are still learning algebra basics, IGNORE this. I made a wrong assumption, thanks to MarkFL for pointing that out!

So far, I was led by my own assumptions to believe that this:

a1
$$\frac{1}{5} + \frac{y}{2} = 7$$

could be turned into this:
a2
$$\frac{2}{10} + \frac{5y}{10} = \frac{70}{10}$$

to then cancel the denominators all across and get this:
a3
$$2 + 5y = 70$$This seemed to work fine and did wonders until some of my answers did not match the textbook's answer section where equations had more than one variable on the same side. I just want to know: is this a rule of some sort or are my now corrected assumptions (can cancel out as long as different variables are on opposite side) invalid still? (I'll re-ask at the end of this post in case this post gets across as messy).

I'll demonstrate what I now believe to be wrong then what I believe to be right :

-- Believed Wrong: -------
b1
$$\frac{x}{5} + \frac{y}{2} = 7$$

is transformed into:
b2
$$\frac{2x}{10} + \frac{5y}{10} = \frac{70}{10}$$

cancels out to:
b3
$$2x + 5y = 70$$

-- Believed Right: ---------
c1
$$\frac{x}{5} + \frac{y}{2} = 7$$

1st, make sure different different variables are transferred on different sides BEFORE canceling out method :
c2
$$\frac{y}{2} = \frac{-x}{5} + 7$$

c3
$$\frac{5y}{10} = \frac{-2x}{10} + \frac{70}{10}$$

c4
$$5y = -2x + 70$$

(which you'd then do y = other side over 5, etc, I'm only illustrating the canceling out part)So just to recap, is it right to believe that canceling out using the "same denominator" method requires that no two or more different variables be on the same side of the equation?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Your equations b3 and c4 are equivalent, just arranged differently. They are both correct as well. It doesn't matter if there is more than one variable on one side of an equation, you can always multiply both sides of an equation by a non-zero constant and get an equivalent equation.
 
MarkFL said:
Your equations b3 and c4 are equivalent, just arranged differently.

Hmm, you're right. Thanks a lot for the reply by the way.

I'll have to re-check my notes tonight (GMT-5 here so 7:28am) and see from the exact equations and not make them coincide like the ones I wrote off the bat above.

I'll leave as unsolved for the moment but will add where I screwed up with the actual data latest tomorrow.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top