Can't understand one step in derivation (partition function)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on understanding the derivation of the average energy in statistical mechanics as it relates to the partition function, specifically the equation -1/Z dZ(beta)/d beta = -dlnZ(beta)/d beta. The partition function Z(beta) is defined as e^{-(beta) E}. A user sought clarification on the equivalence of the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) of the equation, ultimately realizing that the relationship is established through the application of the chain rule in calculus. The user confirmed their understanding after receiving assistance from another forum member.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics concepts, particularly the partition function.
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically differentiation and the chain rule.
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their derivatives.
  • Basic comprehension of energy states in thermodynamics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the partition function in statistical mechanics.
  • Learn about the application of the chain rule in calculus.
  • Explore the relationship between average energy and partition functions in thermodynamic systems.
  • Investigate advanced topics in statistical mechanics, such as canonical ensembles.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students of statistical mechanics, physicists, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of thermodynamics and energy calculations.

tomyuey938
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
This is from self-study coursework rather than homework. I hope it's ok in this forum.

I'm following a statistical mechanics lecture on youtube, and the professor is deriving the average energy as a function of the partition function. He goes:

-1/Z dZ(beta)/d beta = -dlnZ(beta) / d beta

where Z(beta) is the partition function = e^{-(beta) E}.

I spent an hour trying to figure out why the LHS equals the RHS (from both directions, including using differentiation by substitution) but I just can't figure out how he does it.

Perhaps this is a really simple question (and if so, I apologies for my stupidity) but can anyone tell me how to go between the two steps?

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As best as I can figure out (don't know anything about statistical mechanics) this is just a simple derivative. If the LHS reads -1/Z(beta) dZ(beta)/d beta (which I imagine it should) then this is just an application of the chain rule.
To make it easier to think about consider LHS and RHS as positive instead of negative (which we can do by multiplying by -1) then look at the RHS. The derivative of ln(Z(beta)) is found by the Calc 1 rule "derivative of the inside times the derivative of the outside" where the inside is Z(beta) and the outside is ln(Z(beta))
thus you have 1/Z(beta) (the direct derivative of ln(Z(beta))) times dZ(beta)/dbeta (the derivative of the argument of ln)
 
dot.hack, thank you so much, I've got it now. I made such a trivial mistake. I really appreciate your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K