Cantilever with end mass - Moment of inertia

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the natural frequency of a cantilever beam with an end mass using the formula f=(1/2*pi)*SQRT(3EI/mL^3). Participants clarify that the moment of inertia (I) must be the area moment of inertia, not the mass moment of inertia, as per Steiner's theorem. The correct formula for the area moment of inertia for a rectangular beam is I = (bh^3)/12, where b and h are the beam's dimensions. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using consistent units and understanding the distinction between mass and area moments of inertia to achieve accurate frequency calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cantilever beam mechanics
  • Familiarity with natural frequency calculations
  • Knowledge of Steiner's theorem for moment of inertia
  • Proficiency in dimensional analysis and unit consistency
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the derivation of natural frequency formulas for cantilever beams
  • Study the application of Steiner's theorem in structural engineering
  • Research the differences between mass moment of inertia and area moment of inertia
  • Explore resources on beam stiffness calculations and their implications in engineering
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, structural engineers, and students studying dynamics and vibrations in engineering applications will benefit from this discussion.

Dalmaril
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hello! I have a problem and if anyone could help that would be great.

Imagine that you have a cantilever beam of length L and has an end mass m. In order to calculate the natural frequency I use the equation:

f=(1/2*pi)*SQRT(3EI/mL^3).

a) The moment of inertia in the equation is the sum of both the cantilever and the mass, correct??
b) The moment of inertia of the mass is given through Steiner theorem: I = Ic + ma^2, where Ic = (bh^3)/12 (b and h are the mass' geometric characteristics) and a is the distance from the CM of the beam, correct??
c) The problem is that when I input these parameters to the frequency equation, I am not getting Hz at the end. Is (a) and (b) correct, cause that's where I think the problem is.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I didn't check the formula; I only did a dimensional analysis and I get s^(-1). I'm guessing you're using ips units? If so, what units are you using for I? For m?
 
E is in GPa , 1 Pa = 1 kg m^-1 s^-2
I is in m^4
m is in kg and L is in m.

But in the equation for the total I, there is the term of ma^2. Doesn't that have units kgm^2 or am i getting wrong somehow?
 
Only a quick answer. I'm rushing off and will visit later. But, you've criss-crossed moments terms. You can't use bh^3 (an area term) together with ma^2 (a mass term). See if you can straighten it out; if not, I'll give you a hand later.
 
Yes you are right, I saw that too :).. I need the area moment of inertia so the steiner theorem changes. I think that will do the trick. Thanks!
 
Dalmaril said:
Yes you are right, I saw that too :).. I need the area moment of inertia so the steiner theorem changes. I think that will do the trick. Thanks!

OK, that does indeed give you the right units. Now the big question: Have you used the correct I? Here's what you need to think about.
Is the beam considered massless?
Does the beam have significantly less mass than m?
Does the beam have a mass comparable to m?
Do you know the derivation of the formula you used?

HINT: Your formula looks like you're using an essentially massless beam and a point mass (what is the area of a point?).

I don't know what course you're in or whether you're interested in looking deeper, but here's a link you might look at (but only after you try it on your own).
http://www.vibrationdata.com/tutorials2/beam.pdf
 
So, did you figure out how to do this?
 
hello, I think you might mistake the moment of inertia [kg*m^2] for the second moment of area [m^4].
for the calculation of stiffness k is just m^4 for interest.
 
i need the formula for finding moment of inertia of rectangular beam. i have failed to know why the units are mm^4
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
8K