Is Graphing Capacitance vs. 1/d More Effective?

Thread starter databug72
Start date Jun 23, 2019
Tags

Capacitance Plates

Click For Summary

The formula C=E0(A/d) indicates that capacitance (C) is inversely proportional to distance (d). Graphing capacitance against distance does not yield a linear relationship. Instead, plotting capacitance against 1/d is recommended for a more effective analysis. This approach is expected to produce a straight line, confirming the theoretical relationship. Using this method enhances understanding of how capacitance varies with distance.

Jun 23, 2019

databug72

Homework Statement: I had a physics lab where I measured the capacitance between two parallel plates. I was told to make two graphs of Capacitance vs. distance, one for i) d ≤ 1.0cm and another for ii) d ≥ 1.0cm. Then I was asked which data range (d>1cm or d< 1cm) better fits the parallel plate formula by comparing the graphs for each data range (see the pictures below). I was also asked to explain why it fits better in terms of the assumptions built into the derivation of the parallel plate formula.
Also, I am confused about which formula to use. I believe that I am supposed to use C=E0(A/d)

Also I believe that the assumptions of the parallel plate formula are that the plates are large and close together, so the charge is distributed uniformly over each plate (not entirely sure).
Because of this , I think that the graph for values of d less than 1 cm is more accurate, however i do not know how to explain this in terms of slope of the graph, or how to relate the equation y=-529+306 or how to explain this in terms of the assumptions built into the parallel plate formula.

Relevant Equations: C=E0(A/d) (I am not sure if this is the correct equation to use)

Physics news on Phys.org

Jun 23, 2019

willem2

C=E₀(A/d) is the correct formula. You won't get a straight line if you graph C versus d. It would be more useful to graph C versus 1/d and check if that is a straight line.

Thread 'Magnitude of buoyant force in fluids of different densities'

The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

View full post »