Capacitance of a parallel plate capacitor with 2 dielectrics

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 7K views
bigevil
Messages
77
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the capacitance of the parallel plate capacitor with 2 dielectrics below. Given that the parallel plate capacitor has area A = WL and the separation between plates is d.

vfedyr.png



The Attempt at a Solution



My method is to use integration. First solve for two small capacitors dC1, dC2 and then sum them up in parallel.

[tex]y = \frac{d}{L}x[/tex]

[tex]dC_1 = \frac{\kappa_1 \epsilon_0 WL dx}{d(L-x)}[/tex]

[tex]dC_2 = \frac{\kappa_2 \epsilon_0 WL}{d} \frac{1}{x} dx[/tex]

[tex]dC = \frac{dC_1 dC_2}{dC_1 + dC_2} = \frac{\kappa_1 \kappa_2 \epsilon_0 WL}{d} \cdot \frac{1}{\kappa_2 L + x(\kappa_1 - \kappa_2)}[/tex]

[tex]C = \frac{\kappa_1\kappa_2 \epsilon_0 WL}{d(\kappa_1 - \kappa_2)} \left[ ln (\kappa_2 L + x(\kappa_1 - \kappa_2) \right]_0^L[/tex]

The expression is definitely wrong. If we let the two dielectrics have equal value k, we should expect C to follow that of a single dielectric, C' = kC.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have one more L in the expressions of dC. The area of an elementary capacitor is Wdx.

ehild
 
Ok, but L is a constant and having amended that, it doesn't make the final integral any more correct. The ln form of the last equation is still clearly wrong.
 
Are you sure that the ln is wrong? You can not simply substitute K1=K2, it will lead to 0/0. You have to take the limit K2/K1-->1.
ehild
 
Last edited: