Capacitance of three concentric shells

  • Thread starter Thread starter Kashmir
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitance
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The capacitance of three concentric shells can be calculated by considering only the outermost and innermost shells, as the middle shell acts as an equipotential surface and does not affect the capacitance. The potential difference V between the shells is given by the formula V = kQ[1/a - 1/c], where k = 1/(4 * π * ε). The capacitance C is then determined using the formula C = Q/V. This method is valid even when a thick concentric shell is introduced, provided it maintains equal vacuum gaps between the conductors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and potentials
  • Familiarity with capacitance calculations
  • Knowledge of concentric shell configurations
  • Basic grasp of electrostatics principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of capacitance for concentric spherical shells
  • Explore the effects of introducing dielectric materials between conductors
  • Learn about the concept of equipotential surfaces in electrostatics
  • Investigate the impact of varying shell thickness on capacitance
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, physicists, and anyone interested in understanding capacitance in multi-shell systems.

Kashmir
Messages
466
Reaction score
74
Homework Statement
A friend of mine sent me this problem about finding the capacitance.
We have three concentric shells of radius a, b, c. And we've to find the capacitance between x and y.

I need help.

Thank you
Relevant Equations
C=Q/V
IMG-20230727-WA0003.jpg


I want to calculate the capacitance of this system between the points x&y.
So suppose I give a charge Q to the outermost shell and -Q to the innermost shell. To find the capacitance C, I try to find the potential V between the outermost shell and innermost shell .
To find V ,I integrate the electric field and find it out to be V=kq[1/a -1/c] where k=1/(4 *pi*epsilon). Then I can find C =Q/V.
Is this approach correct.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This approach is correct. You should get the capacitance between the outer and inner shells the usual way as if the middle shell were not there. The middle shell is affecting nothing because it is an equipotential surface at the potential that would be there if there were vacuum between the shells.

A slightly more interesting problem might be to find the capacitance if a thick concentric shell were placed in between having wall thickness, say ##d=\frac{1}{2}(c-a)## with equal vacuum gaps between conductors.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kashmir and berkeman
kuruman said:
This approach is correct. You should get the capacitance between the outer and inner shells the usual way as if the middle shell were not there. The middle shell is affecting nothing because it is an equipotential surface at the potential that would be there if there were vacuum between the shells.

A slightly more interesting problem might be to find the capacitance if a thick concentric shell were placed in between having wall thickness, say ##d=\frac{1}{2}(c-a)## with equal vacuum gaps between conductors.
Thank you. I’ll try your question :)
 
You don't need to do any integration. Just write down the potential at radius a due to the two shells. You know that the potential due to the outer shell there is the same as it is at radius c.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kashmir

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
16K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K