Capacitor Discharge equation help

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of capacitors in series and parallel configurations, specifically addressing the equations governing their discharge. The equation I = V/R * e^(-t/RC) is used to analyze current over time, revealing that combining capacitors in series results in halved capacitance and doubled equivalent series resistance (ESR), while voltage doubles. Participants emphasize the importance of using bleeder resistors to ensure equal voltage distribution across capacitors in series to prevent overvoltage and potential failure. The conversation concludes with a clarification that the area under the current-time curve remains consistent regardless of the configuration, as it represents the total energy stored.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of capacitor configurations: series and parallel
  • Knowledge of equivalent series resistance (ESR)
  • Familiarity with the capacitor discharge equation I = V/R * e^(-t/RC)
  • Basic principles of electrical energy storage and discharge
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of ESR on capacitor performance in high-current applications
  • Learn about voltage division techniques in series capacitor configurations
  • Explore the design of capacitor banks for high-energy applications, such as rail guns
  • Investigate the use of bleeder resistors in capacitor circuits to prevent overvoltage
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, hobbyists designing capacitor banks, and anyone involved in high-current applications requiring precise capacitor configurations.

axi0m
Messages
59
Reaction score
0
I have been testing this equation with various different capacitors and capacitor bank values for V, R and C. I have found that when combining two capacitors in series (V doubles, C is divided in half, R is doubled) the following equation yields the same I-curve over t as a single capacitor. Wouldn't the area of the I curve be equal to the capacitor's (or bank's) total energy? In other words, shouldn't U=It?

I = V/R * e^(-t/RC)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
axi0m said:
I have been testing this equation with various different capacitors and capacitor bank values for V, R and C. I have found that when combining two capacitors in series (V doubles, C is divided in half, R is doubled) the following equation yields the same I-curve over t as a single capacitor. Wouldn't the area of the I curve be equal to the capacitor's (or bank's) total energy? In other words, shouldn't U=It?

I = V/R * e^(-t/RC)

Just putting two caps in series does nothing to the voltage and resistance. you must mean something else in your question?
 
berkeman said:
Just putting two caps in series does nothing to the voltage and resistance. you must mean something else in your question?

Ahhh, I guess I've been gravely mistaken. I was under the belief that when you add two capacitors in:

series, you double the ESR (because two resistors in series double the resistance,) divide capacitance by two, and double the voltage

parallel, you double capacitance, voltage remains the same, and you divide resistance in half

Would it be too much to ask for you to kindly provide me with the proper values of said properties when combining two capacitors in parallel and in series?
 
axi0m said:
Ahhh, I guess I've been gravely mistaken. I was under the belief that when you add two capacitors in:

series, you double the ESR (because two resistors in series double the resistance,) divide capacitance by two, and double the voltage

parallel, you double capacitance, voltage remains the same, and you divide resistance in half

Would it be too much to ask for you to kindly provide me with the proper values of said properties when combining two capacitors in parallel and in series?

Ah, you didn't say that the R in your question was the ESR of the cap(s). Yes, series connecting two identical caps will halve the capacitance and double the ESR. By saying that it will double some voltage, I assume you mean if they are charged up initially and then placed in series still charged. Yes, that will double the voltage.

Are you then shorting them out to use the equation that you posted? The only "R" is the ESR values?
 
berkeman said:
Ah, you didn't say that the R in your question was the ESR of the cap(s). Yes, series connecting two identical caps will halve the capacitance and double the ESR. By saying that it will double some voltage, I assume you mean if they are charged up initially and then placed in series still charged. Yes, that will double the voltage.

Are you then shorting them out to use the equation that you posted? The only "R" is the ESR values?

By doubling voltage, I meant that if you place two 450V max. caps in series, you can now charge the bank up to 900V rather than only 450V.

Yes, they will be shorted-out and there is no additionally resistance in the circuit, other than ESR.
 
axi0m said:
By doubling voltage, I meant that if you place two 450V max. caps in series, you can now charge the bank up to 900V rather than only 450V.

Yes, they will be shorted-out and there is no additionally resistance in the circuit, other than ESR.

Oh, that's different. In general you want to use a single cap with the full voltage rating. If you are placing caps in series to try to get a higher overall voltage rating, you need to do something additional to ensure that the total voltage divides equally across the two lower voltage capacitors. Otherwise, one could have its voltage rating exceeded and blow, and then the other will blow.

You would generally ensure the equal voltage division with large-value resistors that are placed around each cap. Something like 100kOhms around each cap.

Can you not obtain a single cap with the full voltage rating?
 
berkeman said:
Oh, that's different. In general you want to use a single cap with the full voltage rating. If you are placing caps in series to try to get a higher overall voltage rating, you need to do something additional to ensure that the total voltage divides equally across the two lower voltage capacitors. Otherwise, one could have its voltage rating exceeded and blow, and then the other will blow.

You would generally ensure the equal voltage division with large-value resistors that are placed around each cap. Something like 100kOhms around each cap.

Can you not obtain a single cap with the full voltage rating?

Well, I'm designing a cap bank for a rail gun so relatively high ampere currents are desired. Though not yet exacted, said current will probably require a higher voltage than I can find in a cap of sufficient capacitance. So, at this point, I'm trying to configure the best cap bank with regard to series, parallel or a combination.
 
axi0m said:
Well, I'm designing a cap bank for a rail gun so relatively high ampere currents are desired. Though not yet exacted, said current will probably require a higher voltage than I can find in a cap of sufficient capacitance. So, at this point, I'm trying to configure the best cap bank with regard to series, parallel or a combination.
The problem with two caps in series is that during discharge, the voltage on one could drop faster than the other, you could overvoltage one, or even reverse voltage one.. If you do have series caps, put bleeder resistors across them, or if you have many cap-pairs in series, tie the inter-cap connections together.
 
Bob S said:
The problem with two caps in series is that during discharge, the voltage on one could drop faster than the other, you could overvoltage one, or even reverse voltage one.. If you do have series caps, put bleeder resistors across them, or if you have many cap-pairs in series, tie the inter-cap connections together.

I see, thank you guys greatly for the tips. I will be sure to implement them.

On a separate note, since two caps in series contain the same amount of stored energy as two caps in parallel, wouldn't the current-time curve have the same area under the function that is specified in the first post?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K