Capacitor Problem: Find Charge & Potential Difference

  • Thread starter Thread starter takando12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capacitor
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two capacitors with capacitances of 3μF and 6μF, initially charged to potentials of 2V and 5V, respectively. They are connected in series, and the task is to find the charge and potential difference across each capacitor after the connection.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply the formulas for charge and capacitance but expresses confusion about how the charge behaves when the capacitors are connected in series.
  • Some participants question the source of the total voltage after connection, noting that it appears to exceed the initial voltages of the individual capacitors.
  • Others suggest reconsidering the arrangement of the capacitors, questioning whether they are connected in series or parallel and how this affects the voltage and charge distribution.
  • There is a discussion about the behavior of charge in series connections and whether the total charge splits equally between the capacitors.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem setup. Some guidance has been offered regarding the behavior of charge in series connections, but there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach or interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential ambiguities in the problem statement, including whether the capacitors are intended to be connected in series or parallel, and the implications of this for charge and voltage. There is also mention of the need for clarity regarding the polarity of the capacitors.

takando12
Messages
122
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Two capacitors of capacitances 3μf and 6μf are charged to potentials of 2V and 5V respectively. These 2 charged capacitors are now connected in series.Find the charge and potential difference across each of the capacitors now.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Q1=C1V1 Q2=C2V2
Q1= 6*10-6 Q2=3*10-5
Total charge Q= 36*10-6C
Net capacitance of combination in series.
1/Cs= 1/C1 + 1/C2
Cs= 2μf
Potentital difference of system in series = Q/Cs
V= 18V
The problem I am facing is finding the charge on each capacitor. I don't think it can be the same as before because the potential differences across them definitely would have changed. And in rule, capacitors in series get the same charge. So does that mean the 36*10-6C splits equally between them? Or do they both have 36*10-6.C And for either, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
takando12 said:
V= 18V
Initially, the capacitors were charged to 5V and 2V. Where did this extra voltage come from? How can this voltage be greater than the initial individual capacitor voltages?
 
cnh1995 said:
Initially, the capacitors were charged to 5V and 2V. Where did this extra voltage come from? How can this voltage be greater than the initial individual capacitor voltages?
So what I've done is wrong. Where exactly should the change be?
 
The capacitors are connected in parallel and series at the same time. The moment you make this connection, voltages across both of them become same. What about the polarity of the capacitors? How are they connected?
 
takando12 said:
Two capacitors of capacitances 3μf and 6μf are charged to potentials of 2V and 5V respectively. These 2 charged capacitors are now connected in series.Find the charge and potential difference across each of the capacitors now.
It is not clear whether this is intended as a trick question, or not.

Just as you can connect 2 batteries in series to obtain a combined voltage = sum of individual voltages, then you can likewise connect 2 charged capacitors in series and obtain combined voltage = sum of the individual voltages. (Or you can obtain the difference in their voltages if you reverse the way one is connected.)

When you connect 2 batteries "in series" you don't then short-circuit their outer terminals, and I see no reason why when you connect 2 capacitors in series you would then be expected to "short" their outer terminals, either, not unless instructed to. So I think this is a trick question---not much calculation involved at all!

That's the answer I would give to this question, and what I consider is the correct answer.

A different arrangement is to connect a pair of charged capacitors in parallel. This seems to be how you are interpreting the question, though personally I would not mark this as correct for the question as presented.

In the parallel connection there is a rearrangement of charge. While charge is conserved here, you'll find that energy is not conserved when charged capacitors are connected in parallel.
 
This thread has been cleaned up, and an erroneous post removed.
 
takando12 said:
And in rule, capacitors in series get the same charge. So does that mean the 36*10-6C splits equally between them? Or do they both have 36*10-6.C And for either, why?
When one charged capacitor is connected across another this causes an identical pulse of current through each and results in equal amounts of charge being moved from/to each capacitor. In calculations it serves as a useful reminder if you denote this change in charge on the plates as ∆Q.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K