Capturing radioactive particles in air

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for capturing radioactive particles in the air, particularly in the context of atmospheric conditions. Participants explore various techniques and materials that could be used for this purpose, including the challenges posed by low temperatures and the nature of different radioactive particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using HEPA filters and bubbling air through water as potential methods for capturing radioactive particles.
  • One participant mentions a paper they wrote on electrostatic deposition of radionuclides, indicating a specific method for capturing particles.
  • There is a discussion about the effectiveness of moisture in the air for capturing radioactive particles, with one participant noting that some radioactive particles are gases and may not be captured effectively.
  • Another participant proposes the idea of using a statically charged surface to attract ionized progeny of alpha emitters.
  • One participant discusses the decay chains of specific isotopes, suggesting that filters could be used to capture isotopes like Caesium-137 and Strontium-90 from dust particulates in the air.
  • There is mention of using activated charcoal filters for absorbing halides before they decay into other isotopes.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about capturing radioactive particles that are already in the air, questioning if filtering is the only option.
  • Another participant asks for clarification on the context of the project, suggesting that the design of the building may influence the methods used for capturing radioactive particles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of methods and ideas for capturing radioactive particles, but there is no consensus on the best approach. Some participants agree on the use of filters, while others raise concerns about the limitations of certain methods, particularly regarding gaseous radioactive particles.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the challenges posed by low temperatures on moisture capture and the behavior of different radioactive gases. The discussion includes various assumptions about the effectiveness of proposed methods without resolving these uncertainties.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying environmental science, nuclear engineering, or architecture with a focus on safety in radioactive environments.

winnie_t
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Hi!

I know that there are several way to capture radioactive particles in water, but does anyone know how to capture the particles in air? I thought above using moisture to trap the particle, but what if temperature is very low hence hard to introduce moisture? Is there any other ways to trap the radioactive particles in air?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
winnie_t said:
I know that there are several way to capture radioactive particles in water, but does anyone know how to capture the particles in air?

HEPA filters.
Bubble air through some water.
 
nikkkom said:
HEPA filters.
Bubble air through some water.

I actually meant air as in the atmosphere, open air.
 
winnie_t said:
I actually meant air as in the atmosphere, open air.

What about those two examples says that it isn't using open air?
 
terryphi said:
Oh man, I actually wrote a paper on this!

terryphi, I have a read through your paper, but I still don't understand (sorry I don't know much science at all, so if you don't mind explaining in laymen's term...)

what was the reason for radioactive balloon? and so how is it possible to capture the radioactive particles in the air?
 
Drakkith said:
What about those two examples says that it isn't using open air?

did you mean "HEPA filters and Bubble air through some water" ?

I am trying to work out how to prevent the radioactive particle from traveling through the air so I'm really looking for some method that can attract the radioactive particles and capture them in air, like how Zeolite would capture the radioactive particles in water.
 
winnie_t said:
did you mean "HEPA filters and Bubble air through some water" ?

I am trying to work out how to prevent the radioactive particle from traveling through the air so I'm really looking for some method that can attract the radioactive particles and capture them in air, like how Zeolite would capture the radioactive particles in water.

Ah I see. You want to disperse something over a wide area that will trap the radioactive particles.
 
The progeny of alpha emitters are ionized. If you have a statically charged surface, they will stick to it.
 
  • #10
Drakkith said:
Ah I see. You want to disperse something over a wide area that will trap the radioactive particles.

yes, exactly. it would normally be possible to capture it using moisture in the air? but I wonder what if the temperature is really low can moisture can't be form? there must be other way to capture the radioactive particles...

terryphi said:
The progeny of alpha emitters are ionized. If you have a statically charged surface, they will stick to it.
so it would be exactly opposite for the beta emitters?
 
  • #11
Winnie I have no doubt that moisture in the air will capture at least some radioactive particles. Rainfall and other precipitation does have the effect of clearing the air. HOWEVER, remember that some radioactive particles are actually gasses and will not be cleared out like others will be.
 
  • #12
Drakkith said:
Winnie I have no doubt that moisture in the air will capture at least some radioactive particles. Rainfall and other precipitation does have the effect of clearing the air. HOWEVER, remember that some radioactive particles are actually gasses and will not be cleared out like others will be.

Thanks Drakkith, that's a very good point. I don't think I have a clear picture of how radioactive gasses behave, do you have any suggestion where I can find out more?
 
  • #13
winnie_t said:
Thanks Drakkith, that's a very good point. I don't think I have a clear picture of how radioactive gasses behave, do you have any suggestion where I can find out more?

I can't say I do. I am not an expert in nuclear engineering. However, I would recommend that you first find out what radioactive particles you are wanting to trap. Are you doing this as an amateur project, or do you have working knowledge of radioactivity?
 
  • #14
Drakkith said:
I can't say I do. I am not an expert in nuclear engineering. However, I would recommend that you first find out what radioactive particles you are wanting to trap. Are you doing this as an amateur project, or do you have working knowledge of radioactivity?

no, I'm actually an architecture student, I'm just researching for my building design, I'm trying to capture Caesium-137 and Strontium-90.
 
  • #15
winnie_t said:
no, I'm actually an architecture student, I'm just researching for my building design, I'm trying to capture Caesium-137 and Strontium-90.
those isotopes would be deposited on dust particulates, to one simply needs filters in the air intake system.

Sr and Cs isotopes are either direct fission products are come from decay of precursors, which are fission products.

Se > Br > Kr > Rb > Sr, and Sr decays to > Y

Te > I > Xe > Cs, and Cs decays to Ba > La

One would probably want a coarse filter followed by a bank of HEPA filters, with minimal pressure drop to minimize energy required for airflow.

Halides, Br and I are absorbed on activated charcoal filters, which is best done at the source.
 
  • #16
Astronuc said:
those isotopes would be deposited on dust particulates, to one simply needs filters in the air intake system.

Sr and Cs isotopes are either direct fission products are come from decay of precursors, which are fission products.

Se > Br > Kr > Rb > Sr, and Sr decays to > Y

Te > I > Xe > Cs, and Cs decays to Ba > La

One would probably want a coarse filter followed by a bank of HEPA filters, with minimal pressure drop to minimize energy required for airflow.

Halides, Br and I are absorbed on activated charcoal filters, which is best done at the source.

Thanks Astronuc.

Sorry for my lack of knowledge here, so you mean to try to absorb Br and I before they decay into Sr and Cs? What if it is already at the stage of Cs and Sr? Would I be able to some how capture them as they release into the air? is there other option besides filtering the air?
 
  • #17
winnie_t said:
Thanks Astronuc.

Sorry for my lack of knowledge here, so you mean to try to absorb Br and I before they decay into Sr and Cs? What if it is already at the stage of Cs and Sr? Would I be able to some how capture them as they release into the air? is there other option besides filtering the air?
I was providing the decay chains. The place to capture Br and I is at the nuclear plant, which is what plant systems are designed to do. Radionuclides of Br and I decay to corresponding Kr and Xe isotopes, and being noble gases, they cannot chemically react, so they are readily transported in the atmosphere. Radionuclides of Kr and Xe decay to Rb and Cs, and these will deposit on surfaces and on dust, where they decay to Sr and Ba respectively. Rb and Cs are like Na and K, so they are readily soluble in water, and will usually be found in the ground or water. For a building, air filtration through a coarse filter followed by a fine filter works best.
 
  • #18
If you want help, why don't you first describe what you are trying to do?

Are you designing an office building on the premises of NPP?
Or a nuclear shelter?
Or an ordinary office skyscraper which for some reason needs to be made safer against fallout?
 
  • #19
nikkkom said:
If you want help, why don't you first describe what you are trying to do?

Are you designing an office building on the premises of NPP?
Or a nuclear shelter?
Or an ordinary office skyscraper which for some reason needs to be made safer against fallout?

it is going to sound strange what I am trying to do, but bear in mind its a imaginative student project.

My site is in chernobyl and I am designing a lab surrounding the red forest, trying to capture the state of ruin of the forest. Hence I would aim to capture whatever radioactivity that is trying to escape out of the boundary of the lab and feed it back into the forest.

That would achieve two things : 1. keep the state of ruin and strange plant growth in the red forest, 2. stop future radioactive pollution out of the boundary of the project.

One key point is that the lab that surround the forest would not provide a cover so my key concern is how to stop the radioactivity escape / spread beyond the boundary of the lab.

I might as well list all of my concerns here actually:
1. how to stop the radioactivity escape / spread beyond the boundary of the lab
2. how does radioactivity travel through soil, hence knowing how to design the foundation of the lab to stop the escape of radioactive particles
3. I'm sure the radioactive level would vary at different height of the atmosphere but not yet know how... i.e. if there is any data of radioactive level of chernobyl in section rather than in plan
4. is there a way to maintain the radioactivity in the site in a long term view (once the original sources had finished its decay)
 
  • #20
In order "to capture the state of ruin of the forest", you can simply walk into it, collect samples and do whatever tests you want on them.

> stop future radioactive pollution out of the boundary of the project.

There is no definite borders of contaminated areas in Chernobyl. Concentration of radionuclides in soil simply gradually decreases as you leave most contaminated areas.

And anyway, it was found that soil contamination is not very mobile. It moves at best a few tens of meters per year.

Perhaps the most efficient transfer of radionuclides happens with forest fires. They can be prevented by standard forestry techniques.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K