Car Braking Distance at Different Initial Speeds

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mike667
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Braking Car
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the minimum braking distance for a car that initially travels at 60 m/s, given that it stops from 20 m/s after traveling distance b. The problem involves concepts from kinematics and the work-energy theorem.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various approaches, including kinematic equations and the work-energy theorem. There is discussion about relating frictional force to distance and how to set up equations for both scenarios. Some participants express confusion about the variables involved and how to manipulate the equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, attempting to set up equations and clarify their understanding of the relationships between variables. Guidance has been offered on how to approach the problem, but there remains some uncertainty about the correct interpretation of the results.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the variables and the setup of the equations, particularly in distinguishing between the distances b and x. Some participants mention the need for further assistance with algebraic manipulation.

Mike667
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A car with an initial speed of 20 m/s brakes to a complete stop after traveling distance b from the moment the brakes are applied. What would be the minimum braking distance if the initial speed was 60 m/s?


Homework Equations



W= ΔKE


The Attempt at a Solution


I know for a fact that the answer is 9 or 9b. Simply because 60 is 3 times greater than 20. 3^2 is 9. But, I am having trouble solving this with the formula. Can someone help me out here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Two basic ways to approach this; from kinematics there is an eqn which relates velocity^2 to a, acceleration and x distance.

An alternative approach would be to use work energy theorum, which is how you are setting this up. Do you know an eqn that relates frictional force (braking in this instance) with distance?
 
denverdoc said:
Two basic ways to approach this; from kinematics there is an eqn which relates velocity^2 to a, acceleration and x distance.

An alternative approach would be to use work energy theorum, which is how you are setting this up. Do you know an eqn that relates frictional force (braking in this instance) with distance?

ΔKE is 1/2(m)(v)^2 right? I have no idea what you mean by an equation that relates frictional force with distance. f*d, perhaps? Where would i put the b in the formula?
 
Last edited:
you're on the right track, my man. B would go where d is.

since final velocity is zero, we know all energy went into friction unless there was a vertical difference, say up a slope involved.

so we set up up eqn, relating the initial kinetic energy to a stopping force, which is directly proportional to mass as well:

1/2mV^2=Ff*b where Ff=m*g*mu, my lord you say we now have more variables. The way out and probably the easiest approach is to set up two equations representative of each situation and to divide the two.
Hope this helps.
 
denverdoc said:
you're on the right track, my man. B would go where d is.

since final velocity is zero, we know all energy went into friction unless there was a vertical difference, say up a slope involved.

so we set up up eqn, relating the initial kinetic energy to a stopping force, which is directly proportional to mass as well:

1/2mV^2=Ff*b where Ff=m*g*mu, my lord you say we now have more variables. The way out and probably the easiest approach is to set up two equations representative of each situation and to divide the two.
Hope this helps.


g is 10 right? but what does mu stand for?
 
Ok, so

f*b = 1/2(m)(20)^2

f*b = 200m?



f*b= 1/2(m)(60)^2

f*b= 1800m?

I feel like I am missing something here.
 
you're getting there.
The mistake is we don't know what b is in the second case, that's an X.
So set it up as you have, and solve for X,
 
Why isn't b an x in the first case then?

f*b = 1/2(m)(20)^2

f*b = 200m?
f*x= 1/2(m)(60)^2

f*x= 1800m?Then what? how can i get the answer to just be 9b?
 
perfect, divide the two eqns, and solve for x in terms of b.
 
  • #10
Ummm can you show that, please?
 
  • #11
I think I see a problem here, you have problems with word problems.
Not alone! Your algebra could likely benefit as well from some tutoring.

So on top of the fraction we have:
f*b=200 on bottom we have fx=1800
therefore b/x=1/9
 
  • #12
Wait wait wait, so you're saying the answer is 1/9, not 9b?
I definitely see where you're coming from, its just that I supposed the answer would look different.
 
  • #13
B/x=1/9, then what is X?
 
  • #14
X is 9, B is 1?
 
  • #15
you have it X=9B.
 
  • #16
alright, thanks a lot man.
 
  • #17
No sweat, recommend PF to all! And get some assistance with algebra if you can as this was the biggest barrier to the soln. Your reasoning spot on, just unfamiliarity with tricks to get the answer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K