Cardinality of continuous functions f:R->R.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining the cardinality of the set of continuous functions from R to R. Participants explore various approaches to establish whether this cardinality is equal to, greater than, or less than 2^c, where c represents the cardinality of the continuum. The conversation includes theoretical considerations and mathematical reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the cardinality of the set of continuous functions is less than or equal to 2^c, but struggles to show it is greater than or equal to 2^c.
  • Another participant proposes constructing a subset of continuous functions with cardinality 2^c, hinting at the use of Taylor series.
  • Several participants discuss potential candidates for subsets, including functions defined on rational numbers and their implications for continuity.
  • One participant questions the utility of Taylor series in this context, noting that while analytic functions are continuous, they may not reach the cardinality of 2^c.
  • Another participant suggests that continuous functions are determined by their values on the rationals, leading to a calculation of cardinality that results in an upper bound.
  • There is a mention of the need to show that the upper bound is achieved, with a reference to counting constant functions as part of the argument.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the cardinality of the set of continuous functions, with some believing it may not be 2^c, while others argue for the possibility of it being equal to or less than 2^c. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact cardinality.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of establishing a one-to-one function from the set of all functions to the set of continuous functions. There are also references to the limitations of certain mathematical arguments and the need for further exploration of subsets.

MathematicalPhysicist
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
4,662
Reaction score
372
i need to find the cardinality of set of continuous functions f:R->R.
well i know that this cardinality is samaller or equal than 2^c, where c is the continuum cardinal.
but to show that it's bigger or equals i find a bit nontrivial.
i mean if R^R is the set of all functions f:R->R, i need to find a 1-1 function from it to the set of continuous functions (lets call it A).
i tried this function g:R^R->A:
g(f)=f if f is continuous function.
g(f)=h if f isn't continuous on R.
where h is a continuous function on Q.
i feel that again i did something wrong my problem is how to correct it, obviously i didnt defined h as i should be, and what's the connection of it to f, but i don't see a way to pass it.
any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You do not have to find a injection from R^R, the set of all functions. A map from any set with that cardinailty will do.

About the best way of doing this (again), is to construct some subset of all continuous functions with cardinality 2^c. It might take some ingenuity, but it isn't that hard (just think of Taylor series).
 
Last edited:
any suggestions?
i mean possible candidates are:
{0,1}^[0,1] P([0,1]) P(R)
i think the third set is the easiest, but gain finding the function is hard task here.
i need to find a function from P(R)->A
perhaps we can mapp from a subset of P(R), say B to a function in A, perhaps f|B (which is a continuous function f:B->R), will that suffice or i need something else?
 
Reread the edited post above.
 
i don't understand, we need to show that the cardinality of A is 2^c, iv'e showed that it's smaller or equals 2^c, now i need to show that it's bigger or equals 2^c.
and you suggest me to:"About the best way of doing this (again), is to construct some subset of all continuous functions with cardinality 2^c"
the only subset i can think of is the set of all functions f:R\Q->R\Q, it's cardinality is 2^c, but is it a subset, i mean every function in this subset is a continuous function cause f(R\Q) is a subset of R\Q.

p.s
i feel I am writing jibberish. )-:
 
well i don't see the connection to here.
i mean f(x)=f(x0)+(x-x0)f'(x0)+(x-x0)^2f''(x0)/2+...
you mean the set of functions which can be written as a taylor expansion as a subset to the set of all continuous functions from R to R.
or perhaps the set of functions of different estimations to f, such as:
f(x0)+(x-x0)f'(x0),f(x0)+(x-x0)f'(x0)+(x-x0)^2f''(x0)/2,...
 
I don't see how Taylor series will help. The most obvious interpretation of that hint shows that there are c|N| analytic functions, and although analytic functions are continuous, c|N| < 2c.
 
Yep. That's why I pulled out to think about it some more.
 
so do you have any advice on this question, perhaps the cardinality isn't 2^c?
 
  • #10
loop quantum gravity said:
so do you have any advice on this question, perhaps the cardinality isn't 2^c?

I didn't think it was -- I thought the restriction of continuity made it c -- but I don't have a proof of this offhand. Let me think about it.
 
  • #12
Oh, it turns out the proof's easy -- any continuous function is completely determined by its values on Q. So,

|C(R, R)| <= |RQ| = |R||Q| = (2|N|)|Q| = 2|N||Q| = 2|NxQ| = 2|N| = |R|
 
Last edited:
  • #13
Duh... And there was me lamenting that analysis isn't much help 'cos I couldn't think of a way of making (different) density arguments work.
 
  • #14
hurkyls argument gives only an upper bound for the cardinality. you have to show it achieves this bound too. but maybe i came in late and missed this part of the discussion.
 
  • #15
mathwonk said:
hurkyls argument gives only an upper bound for the cardinality. you have to show it achieves this bound too. but maybe i came in late and missed this part of the discussion.
Well this is entirely obvious, just count the constant functions.

Nice proof Hurkyl.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K