First, note: [tex]\lvert \mathbb{R} \rvert = 2^{\aleph_0}[/tex], and the statement that [tex]\lvert \mathbb{R} \rvert = \aleph_1[/tex] is the continuum hypothesis holds (which cannot be proven or disproven in ZFC).
I shall denote [tex]c = 2^{\aleph_0} = \lvert \mathbb{R} \rvert[/tex]. Let C be the set of constant functions from [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex] to [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex], and let P be the set of nonconstant periodic functions from [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex] to [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex]; then [tex]A = C \cup P[/tex] is a union of disjoint sets. Clearly [tex]\lvert C \rvert = c[/tex].
Let [tex]P' = \{(p, f') \mid p \in \mathbb{R}^+, f' \colon [0, p) \to \mathbb{R} \}[/tex]; I construct a function [tex]g \colon P \to P'[/tex] by assigning to each periodic function [tex]f \in P[/tex] the pair [tex](p, f')[/tex], where p is the period of f, and f' is the restriction of f to [0, p). It is a bijection; you should check this. Now since [tex]\lvert [0, p) \rvert = \lvert \mathbb{R} \rvert[/tex] for any positive p, [tex]\lvert P \rvert = \lvert P' \rvert = \lvert \mathbb{R}^+ \times \mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}} \rvert = c \cdot c^c = c^c (= 2^{\aleph_0 \cdot c} = 2^c = 2^{2^{\aleph_0}})[/tex]. Thus [tex]\lvert A \rvert = \lvert C \rvert + \lvert P \rvert = c^c = \lvert \mathbb{R}^{\mathbb{R}} \rvert[/tex], the cardinality of the set of all functions from [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex] to [tex]\mathbb{R}[/tex].