Carmichael Number: Proving $(d+p)(p-1)$ Divisor of $q-1$

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter peteryellow
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for a Carmichael number \( n = pqr \), if \( q-1 \) divides \( (d+p)(p-1) \) under the conditions \( q-1|pr-1 \) and \( r-1|pq-1 \), then \( q-1 \) is indeed a divisor of \( (d+p)(p-1) \). The participants clarify that \( pq-1 = d(r-1) \) where \( d \) is defined as \( [2;p-1] \), and they emphasize the importance of understanding these relationships to grasp the proof fully. The discussion highlights the interconnectedness of these divisibility conditions in the context of Carmichael numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Carmichael numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with divisibility rules in number theory
  • Knowledge of modular arithmetic and its applications
  • Basic concepts of prime factorization and its implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Carmichael numbers in detail
  • Explore the implications of divisibility in number theory
  • Learn about modular arithmetic and its role in proofs
  • Investigate related theorems in number theory, such as Fermat's Little Theorem
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, number theorists, and students studying advanced topics in number theory, particularly those interested in the properties and proofs related to Carmichael numbers.

peteryellow
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
$n=pqr$ is a Carmichael number. If $q-1|pr-1$ and $r-1|pq-1$ then show that q-1 is a divisor in
$(d+p)(p-1).$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ok here it is the clear version of it.

n=pqr is carmicahelnumber. if we have that r-1|pq-1 then I have shown that
pq-1=d(r-1) where d is [2;p-1]. Moreover I have shown that q-1|d(r-1)-p+1.
Now I want to show that if q-1|pr-1 is also fulfilled then q-1 is divisor in (d+p)(p-1). Do you understand it?
 
Hi!
I suggest you to read more before publish your problems since this is a very well known question (Wikipedia).
 

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K