Carrying a body up stairs in a plummeting aircraft

  • Thread starter Thread starter jcarle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Aircraft Gravity
AI Thread Summary
When carrying a body up stairs in a plane that is falling, less effort is required compared to when the plane is flying at a constant altitude or ascending. The key factor is the acceleration experienced during these scenarios. In free fall, similar to conditions in a satellite or during parabolic flight (like the vomit comet), the effective weight is reduced to zero, making movement significantly easier. Conversely, if the plane is ascending or maintaining altitude, the additional gravitational force must be overcome, increasing the effort needed to move the body.
jcarle
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Would a body being carried up a set of stairs from one deck to another deck in a plane that is falling take less effort to move than if the plane was flying at constant altitude or ascending. ( I am thriller writer)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes

##\ ##
 
jcarle said:
if the plane was flying at constant altitude or ascending.
. . . . or descending at a constant rate. What counts here is the acceleration up/down which will add or subtract from the steady g. If the plane is in actual free fall then you'd be in the same situation as in a satellite or the vomit comet. A pilot can fly 'downhill' and produce zero g (but only for so long!!!)
 
A map of a four-dimensional planet is three dimensional, so such can exist in our Universe. I made one and posted a video to the Internet. This is all based on William Kingdon Clifford's math from the 19th century. It works like this. A 4D planet has two perpendicular planes of rotation. The intersection of such a plane with the surface of the planet is a great circle. We can define latitude as the arctan( distance from one plane/distance from the other plane). The set of all points...
Back
Top