Castigaliano's Theorem for cantilever beams

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the deflection of a cantilever beam using Castigliano's Theorem. The user initially struggles with the integration process and the appearance of the term b^3 in their calculations. After guidance, they successfully integrate the function with limits from b to L, arriving at the correct expression for deflection: (1/6)*((L^2)*(2L-3B) + B^3). The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the behavior of the function and its implications for integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Castigliano's Theorem
  • Familiarity with integration techniques in calculus
  • Knowledge of beam deflection concepts
  • Ability to interpret piecewise functions and discontinuities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Castigliano's Theorem in structural analysis
  • Learn about piecewise integration and handling discontinuities in calculus
  • Explore beam deflection formulas for various loading conditions
  • Investigate the significance of singularity functions in structural engineering
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in civil engineering, structural analysis, and mechanics who are working on beam deflection problems and applying Castigliano's Theorem in their studies or projects.

hatchelhoff
Messages
64
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi I am trying to derive an expression for the deflection in a cantilever beam using castigliano's theorem.
I have found and attached an example of the solution. I understand the most of what is going on in the attached solution but I don't know where the b^3 came from in the line (b)
castigliano for beam deflection.PNG


Homework Equations


see attached[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


When I perform the integration from line (a) i get
L^2/6(2L-3b). Can anybody explain where the b^3 in line (b) comes from[/B]
 

Attachments

  • castigliano for beam deflection.PNG
    castigliano for beam deflection.PNG
    26.6 KB · Views: 773
Physics news on Phys.org
hatchelhoff said:
When I perform the integration from line (a) i get
L^2/6(2L-3b)
Remember what the <x-b> notation means. How will you integrate wrt x over 0 to l?
 
Are the angular brackets in <a-b> something to do with a singularity function, that is only turned on for certain cases.
 
hatchelhoff said:
Are the angular brackets in <a-b> something to do with a singularity function, that is only turned on for certain cases.
They mean (in the context of moments in beams etc.) max{a-b, 0}.
 
for max{x-b, 0}. I think x-b was chosen as the max in the attached example. so does this mean that <x-b>
can now be change to (x-b) ?
 
hatchelhoff said:
for max{x-b, 0}. I think x-b was chosen as the max in the attached example. so does this mean that <x-b>
can now be change to (x-b) ?
No.
x is the variable of integration and takes values from 0 to l. Draw a graph of <x-b> over that range. How are you going to integrate it?
 
I am having difficulty drawing the graph of <x - b> because I don't have a value for b yet. can you give me a further hint please.
 
hatchelhoff said:
I am having difficulty drawing the graph of <x - b> because I don't have a value for b yet. can you give me a further hint please.
I just meant a schematic graph, it does not have to be exact. x has some range. b is a point within that range.
 
you also mentioned about integrating from 0 to L. This would give me ((L^2)/6)*(2L-3B)) - ((0^2)/6)*(2(0)-3B)). is this correct ?
 
  • #10
hatchelhoff said:
you also mentioned about integrating from 0 to L. This would give me ((L^2)/6)*(2L-3B)) - ((0^2)/6)*(2(0)-3B)). is this correct ?
No. You cannot integrate until you have figured out what to do with the <x-b>.
Have you tried to sketch a graph of <x-b> over the range 0 to L? Remember that 0<b<L. What does it look like?
 
  • #11
I have plotted two charts with different values for b. One chart plots b at 0.1. the other chart plots b at 0.9.
I see in both cases that some of the <x-B> values are below the x-axis and some of the <x-b> are above the x-axis.
 
  • #12
hatchelhoff said:
some of the <x-B> values are below the x-axis
By definition (see post #4) it is never below the x axis.
 
  • #13
ok. So i guess I have to integrate between the limits of <x-b> greater than 0 and less that L. but how do i know if x-b is greater than 0 if I don't have a value for b.
 
  • #14
hatchelhoff said:
ok. So i guess I have to integrate between the limits of <x-b> greater than 0 and less that L. but how do i know if x-b is greater than 0 if I don't have a value for b.
b is a given unknown. You do not need to know its value. Your answer will include a reference to it and be valid for all values of b.
How would you integrate a function that has a discontinuity or suddenly changes slope at some point?
 
  • #15
You would have to perform two integrations. the limits of Integration1 would be from the end to the discontinuity. The limits of Integration2 would be from the discontinuity to the other end. you would then add these integrations together.
 
  • #16
hatchelhoff said:
You would have to perform two integrations. the limits of Integration1 would be from the end to the discontinuity. The limits of Integration2 would be from the discontinuity to the other end. you would then add these integrations together.
Right, so do that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hatchelhoff
  • #17
I performed one integration and I got the correct answer. I integrated using the limits b and L. My answer was (1/6)*((L^2)*(2L-3B) + B^3).
haruspex thanks for you patience and help in getting me to the correct answer. I take it that I only needed to integrate as far as the discontinuity and did not need to integrate the other side !
 
  • #18
hatchelhoff said:
I performed one integration and I got the correct answer. I integrated using the limits b and L. My answer was (1/6)*((L^2)*(2L-3B) + B^3).
haruspex thanks for you patience and help in getting me to the correct answer. I take it that I only needed to integrate as far as the discontinuity and did not need to integrate the other side !
Yes, you do not need to integrate the range where it is zero.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K