Casus irreducibilis with positive roots

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lugita15
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Positive Roots
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of casus irreducibilis in cubic polynomials, specifically seeking examples where all roots are positive. Participants explore the implications of this phenomenon, historical context, and mathematical reasoning related to the existence of such roots.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant explains casus irreducibilis as a situation where a cubic polynomial with integer coefficients has three distinct real roots that cannot be expressed using only real numbers and radicals, requiring complex numbers instead.
  • Another participant suggests a transformation of the polynomial x^3 - 3x + 1 to obtain a new polynomial with positive roots.
  • A participant inquires about examples of cubic polynomials of the form x^3 + ax + b that might meet the criteria of having three positive roots.
  • One participant presents a reasoning process indicating that for a cubic polynomial with three real roots, the nature of the roots and the inflection point suggests that it is impossible for all roots to be positive.
  • Another participant expresses curiosity about how Cardano would have encountered a cubic with this property, given the constraints discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the possibility of finding a cubic polynomial with three positive roots, with some arguing it is impossible while others propose transformations or specific forms that might yield such roots. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the existence of a suitable example.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the nature of the roots and the coefficients of the polynomial, as well as the historical context of mathematical understanding during Cardano's time.

lugita15
Messages
1,553
Reaction score
15
Casus irredicibilis describes a situation where a cubic polynomial with integer coefficients has three distinct real roots, but you can't express those roots using just real numbers and radicals. Instead, if you want to only use radicals, then you must use complex numbers, even though the roots you're interested are purely real.

The example that Planet Math gives is x^3 - 3x +1, but one of the roots of this cubic is negative. This is unsatisfying for me, because in the 1500's when Cardano first discovered the phenomena that cubic equations could not be solved with real numbers alone, the existence of negative numbers had not yet been commonly accepted. So in order to be more historically "authentic", I would prefer an example of casus irreducibilis where all three roots are positive. Does anyone know of such an example?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thank You in Advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A hackish solution: translate p(x) = x^3 - 3x + 1 over to the right by 2 to get p(x-2) = (x-2)^3 - 3(x-2) + 1 = x^3 - 6x^2 + 9x - 1. Now all your roots are positive :)
 
How about an example of the form x^3 + ax + b?
 
Say p(x) = x^3 + ax + b has 3 real roots. Then p''(x) = 6x, so the point of inflection of the cubic is at x = 0. There's no way 3 roots could occur to the right of the point of inflection. Also, looking at p'(x) = 3x^2 + a, the cubic has extrema located at x = ±√(-a/3). If p(-√(-a/3)) > 0 then there must be a (necessarily negative) root to the left of this maximum.

In short, it's impossible.

EDIT: Here is perhaps a more clear "proof" of the impossibility of your desired form: Let u, v, w in R be the three positive roots. Then p(x) = (x - u)(x - v)(x - w) = x^3 - (u + v + w) x^2 + (uv + uw + vw) x - uvw. It really just matters to consider the coefficient of x^2: if it is 0, then we have u + v + w = 0. All of u, v, w are positive, so this is only possible if u = v = w = 0.
 
Last edited:
OK, thanks Unit, using similar reasoning we can easily see that none of the coefficients can be zero. But this leaves me puzzled: how would Cardano have come across a four-term cubic that had this special property?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K