Cauchy Condensation Proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Cauchy Condensation Test states that if \( (b_n) \) is a non-negative decreasing sequence, then the series \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n \) diverges if and only if the series \( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} 2^n b_{2^n} \) diverges. The discussion confirms that the proof involves demonstrating a contradiction by assuming \( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_n \) converges and showing that this leads to \( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} 2^n b_{2^n} \) diverging. The participants emphasize the importance of understanding partial sums and the relationship between the two series.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence and divergence
  • Familiarity with the Cauchy Condensation Test
  • Knowledge of partial sums and their properties
  • Basic concepts of sequences, particularly decreasing sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Cauchy Condensation Test in detail
  • Explore examples of series that satisfy the conditions of the test
  • Learn about the properties of decreasing sequences
  • Investigate other convergence tests, such as the Ratio Test and Root Test
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying real analysis, and anyone interested in understanding series convergence, particularly those focusing on the Cauchy Condensation Test and its applications.

linuxux
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hello. This is the presented problem:

Suppose (b_{n}) is a decreasing satisfying b_{n}\ge\ 0. Show that the series
\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n}
diverges if the series
\sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{2^{n}b_{2^{n}}}
diverges.

I've already proved that i can create \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{2^{n}b_{2^{n}}} from \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n} and that that series is larger, so my first idea is to prove this by finding some kind of contradiction by supposing \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n} converges and trying to prove that the series \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{2^{n}b_{2^{n}}} diverges.

my idea is if \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n} is bounded by M, then the worst case scenario for \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{2^{n}b_{2^{n}}}\ is\ b_{1}\ +\ ...\ +\ 2^{n}M but we know there must be something greater since it is unbounded.

i'm not sure if that reasoning works or not.

thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it must be b_n >= 0. Just letting you know that this is proved in baby Rudin, chapter 3: sequences and series.
 
rudinreader said:
I think it must be b_n >= 0. Just letting you know that this is proved in baby Rudin, chapter 3: sequences and series.

changed, and what is baby rudin?
 
Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd Ed. Walter Rudin. It's a pervasive but nonetheless not uniformly liked book, so it's always in the library.
 
linuxux said:
my first idea is to prove this by finding some kind of contradiction by supposing \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n} converges and trying to prove that the series \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{2^{n}b_{2^{n}}} diverges.

You mean to show that \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{2^{n}b_{2^{n}}} converges correct? This is just the contrapositive of the statement.

Just a hunch. I'm not too well versed with sequences and series, but it looks to me like some sort of root test would be due here.
 
No, no, you want to rearrange the series in a different way to get that the condensed series is no worse than a multiple of the original.
 
linuxux said:
Hello. This is the presented problem:

Suppose (b_{n}) is a decreasing satisfying b_{n}\ge\ 0. Show that the series
\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n}
diverges if the series
\sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{2^{n}b_{2^{n}}}
diverges.

I've already proved that i can create \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{2^{n}b_{2^{n}}} from \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n} and that that series is larger, so my first idea is to prove this by finding some kind of contradiction by supposing \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n} converges and trying to prove that the series \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{2^{n}b_{2^{n}}} diverges.

my idea is if \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n} is bounded by M, then the worst case scenario for \sum^{\infty}_{n=0}{2^{n}b_{2^{n}}}\ is\ b_{1}\ +\ ...\ +\ 2^{n}M but we know there must be something greater since it is unbounded.

i'm not sure if that reasoning works or not.

thanks for the help.

since \{b_n} is a decreasing series we have b1>b2>b3>b4>...>bn
\sum^{\infty}_{k=0}{2^{k}b_{2^{k}}} now let this series diverge,

first let us suppose that n>2^k, now let us take the partial sums of both series

let us denote by Sn the partial sum of the series \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n}
we have Sn=b1+b2+b3+b4+...+bn>1/2b1+b2+(b3+b4)+(b5+b6+b7+b8)+...+(b_2^(k-1)+1...+b_2^k)>1/2 b1 +b2+2b4+4b8+...+2^(k-1)b_2^k), now we multiply both sides by 2 and we get on the right side

b1+2b2+4b4+8b8+...+2^kb_2^k , let us denote this by W_k, so

W_k=b1+2b2+4b4+8b8+...+2^kb_2^k, which actually is the partial sum of the series
\sum^{\infty}_{k=0}{2^{k}b_{2^{k}}}, now eventually we have

2Sn>W_k, so assuming that \sum^{\infty}_{k=0}{2^{k}b_{2^{k}}}, diverges we know that its partial sum is not upper bounded, moreover if we take the limit of its partial sum it converges to infinity, so it automatically yelds that also the partial sum Sn of the series \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n}, is not upper bounded, moreover the limit of it as n-->infinity the partial sum also converges to infinity, so the series \sum^{\infty}_{n=1}b_{n} also diverges.

i appologize for my symbols, and i do not know whether i have written all the neccesary elements, because i did it very quickly now, but anyway this is the idea of prooving this.

i hope i was of any help
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K