Undergrad Cauchy Repeated Integration Explanation?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the Cauchy formula for repeated integration, particularly through the example of two nested integrals. It explains the integration process, highlighting the significance of integrating with respect to sigma and the geometric interpretation of the integration region as a triangle in the number plane. The outer integral runs horizontally while the inner integral runs vertically, illustrating how the bounds are determined. The conversation also touches on the iterative nature of the integration process, allowing for repeated substitutions of derivatives. The thread concludes with a clarification on changing the limits of integration, which was resolved by the original poster.
Physics news on Phys.org
TheDemx27 said:
why are we integrating with respect to sigma, up to sigma in the equation before it?
The easiest way to understand this is to look at the case with only two nested integrals.

$$f^{(-2)}(x)=\int_a^x\int_a^{\sigma_1}f(\sigma_2)d\sigma_2d\sigma_1$$

Now draw the square bordered by (a,a),(a,x),(x,x),(x,a) in the number plane and shade the region in which the integral is being performed, where we map ##\sigma_1## to the horizontal axis and ##\sigma_2## to the vertical axis.
[You may find it easier to visualise this if you set ##a=0,x=1##, and then generalise it later]

The outer integration is along the horizontal axis.
The inner integration is in the vertical direction and, for a given value of ##\sigma_1##, it integrates along the vertical line from ##(\sigma_1,a)## to ##(\sigma_1,\sigma_1)##.

The integration region is the triangle with vertices (a,a), (a,x), (x,x). The triangle is bounded by the horizontal and vertical axes and the 45 degree line with equation ##\sigma_2=\sigma_1##.
 
  • Like
Likes TheDemx27
Start with f(x1) = ∫0x1f'(x2)dx2.
Now replace f'(x2) with its own integral of f''(x3):
f(x1) = ∫0x1[∫0x2f''(x3)dx3]dx2.
The part within square brackets, [], is that substitution.
You can keep doing this as many times as you wish.
 
  • Like
Likes TheDemx27
Thankyou both. One last thing, could someone explain the change of the integral's limits in the third step of the proof by induction? I get that choosing the lower limit as t and the upper limit as x will give you the desired result, but I don't see why you are allowed to do that.
(edit: figured it out on my own)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K