Cauchy Sequence of Continuous Fns: Uniform Convergence?

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 3K views
Kalidor
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Is it true that a cauchy sequence of continuous functions defined on the whole real line converges uniformly to a continuous function?
I thought this was only true for functions defined on a compact subset of the real line.
Am I wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My actual doubt was actually about the convergence. Why does it have to converge? The space of continuous functions defined on the real line is not a banach space as far as I know.
 
Well, take a uniform Cauchy sequence [itex](f_n)_n[/itex]. By definition, it satisfies

[tex]\forall \varepsilon>0:~\exists n_0:~\forall p,q\geq n_0:~\forall x\in \mathbb{R}:~d(f_p(x),f_q(x))<\varepsilon[/tex]

It follows that every sequence [itex](f_n(x))_n[/itex] is Cauchy for all x, so it converges to a [itex]y_x[/itex]. This constructs a function

[tex]f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \mathbb{R}:x\rightarrow y_x[/tex]

By taking limits, we get

[tex]\forall \varepsilon>0:~\exists n_0:~\forall q\geq n_0:~\forall x\in \mathbb{R}:~d(f(x),f_q(x))=\lim_{p\rightarrow +\infty}{d(f_p(x),d_q(x))}\leq\varepsilon[/tex]

This shows that [itex](f_n)_n[/itex] converges uniformly to f.

Is this what you want?
 
It seems to be. But doesn't this amount to saying that [tex]\mathcal{C}(\mathbb{R})[/tex] is complete with respect to the uniform norm?
 
Sure that's what I was missing, thanks.