Cauchy trick for divergent integrals.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the validity of the Cauchy trick for regularizing divergent integrals, specifically examining integrals of the form \(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{x^{2}-a^{2}}\) and \(\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{x+a}\). Participants explore the implications of complex regularization and the use of the Cauchy residue theorem in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the validity of the Cauchy trick in a regularization sense, providing examples of divergent integrals and their complex regularization.
  • Another participant argues that the results derived from the trick are not mathematically valid, stating that divergent integrals should not be assigned a value.
  • A different participant suggests that the process of "complex regularization" may have overlooked changes in the domain of integration, which could explain the finite results obtained.
  • A reference to the Cauchy principal value is provided, indicating that it yields a real value if it exists, but does not adhere to standard rules for variable changes in integrals.
  • It is noted that the principal value computation for the first integral results in zero, despite the integral being improper and divergent.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the validity of the Cauchy trick for regularizing divergent integrals. Some participants challenge the mathematical soundness of the approach, while others defend its use in specific contexts.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions made about the convergence of the integrals and the implications of changing the domain of integration. The discussion does not resolve these issues.

zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
is this trick valid at least in the 'regularization' sense ?? for example

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{x^{2}-a^{2}}[/tex]

then we replace thi integral above by [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{x^{2}+ie-a^{2}}[/tex] for 'e' tending to 0

using Cauchy residue theorem i get [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{x^{2}+ie-a^{2}}=(i\pi )/a[/tex]

the same trick applied to [tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{x+a}= 2\pi i[/tex]

however we have obtained a complex regularization to a Real valued integral, i have seen this trick whenever dealing integrals in Quantum Physics but i want to hear the opinion of a Mathematician.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My opinion: what you wrote is worthless as mathematics. Divergent integrals (as in these two examples) should not be said to "have a value".
 
I am no mathematician, but when you "complex regularize" (whatever that means) I think you forgot to change your domain of integration. Probably that is why this result is finite.
 
The Cauchy principal value for a the integral of a real function is (if it exists) real. But of course, it doesn't obey the usual rules for change of variables in an integral.

[tex] {\rm P.V.}\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{dx}{x^2-a^2} =<br /> \lim _{u\rightarrow 0^{+}} \left( \int _{a+u}^{\infty }\! \left( {x}^{<br /> 2}-{a}^{2} \right) ^{-1}{dx}+\int _{-a+u}^{a-u}\! \left( {x}^{2}-{a}^{<br /> 2} \right) ^{-1}{dx}+\int _{-\infty }^{-a-u}\! \left( {x}^{2}-{a}^{2}<br /> \right) ^{-1}{dx} \right) =0[/tex]

The second example is improper (and divergent) both at [tex]a[/tex] and at [tex]\pm\infty[/tex]. Principal value computation yields zero also in that case.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K