The discussion focuses on the comparative penetration capabilities of 802.11a and 802.11g wireless standards, particularly in relation to their operating frequencies. Participants explore the implications of these frequencies on signal strength and range, as well as the physical principles governing electromagnetic radiation.
Participants generally agree that frequency plays a significant role in the penetration capabilities of the two standards, but the discussion includes multiple perspectives on the extent and implications of this difference. No consensus is reached on all aspects of the topic.
The discussion does not resolve the complexities of signal strength, attenuation, and their dependence on environmental factors. Assumptions regarding the relationship between frequency and penetration are present but not fully explored.
Thank you! Excellent!RFMatt said:Almost all of the extra range comes from the different frequencies, the 2.4GHz band that 802.11g operates in attenuates significantly less than the 5GHz band that 802.11a operates in. As frequency increases (wavelength decreases) the ability to penetrate objects goes down (generally, some exceptions).
As an extreme example, visible light is the same stuff as wifi signals (EM radiation), yet is unable to penetrate even thin paper due to its extremely high frequency.