Center of mass and moment of intertia semi-circle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the center of mass and moment of inertia for a uniform semicircular disk, particularly in the context of applying Lagrangian mechanics to analyze its motion. Participants are exploring the necessary integrals and coordinate systems for these calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the moment of inertia and center of mass calculations, with one attempting to derive the Lagrangian for a rolling semicircular disk. Questions arise regarding the integration process and the implications of the chosen coordinate system.

Discussion Status

Several participants have shared links to resources and provided insights into their approaches. There is an ongoing exploration of the Lagrangian formulation, with some expressing uncertainty about their calculations and the need for clarification on specific aspects of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints such as the requirement to use the parallel axis theorem and the challenge of visualizing the motion without diagrams. There is also a reference to homework rules that may limit the type of assistance that can be provided.

Liquidxlax
Messages
312
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



having some major derp problems. I can't seem to remember how to find moment of inertia about the COM of and object or even finding the COM for that matter.

I need it to solve a Euler Lagrange problem

Can someone give me an idea on the integrals to use and in what coordinate system?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



looked at this site, but I'm not sure http://www.efunda.com/math/areas/circlehalf.cfm"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Spinnor said:

Don't find hyperphysics useful for mechanics, but i figured it out before hand. Thanks though.

I'm uncertain about my answer to the rest of my question though, and i hope i won't have to make another thread for it.

Q. Consider a uniform semicircular disk of radius R, which rolls without slipping on a horizontal surface. Recall that the kinetic energy of an object is the sum of the translational kinetic energy of the centre of mass (point C) and the rotational kinetic energy about the Centre of Mass.

Using Lagrangian methods, show that the angular frequency of small oscillations is

ω = sqrt([8g]/[R(9π -16)])

First thing i did was find it's moment, which is

I = .5mR2

Then i found the centroid

(x,y) = (0, 4R/3π)

Sorry i can't provide a picture, i suck at drawing >.<

So the potential of this motion will be mgh where i found h= (4R/3π)cos(ωt) because the y centroid will move up and down because it isn't at the top of the disk so the width is longer than it's height. (hope i worded that well)

So then the translational velocity I'm assuming will be (dh/dt) = (-ω4R/3π)sin(ωt)

My lagrangian i found to be

L = .5m(dh/dt)2 + .5Iω2 - mg(4R/3π)cos(ωt)

I assume that there is no R dependence so there is no need to do the dl/dR = (d/dt)(dL/dv)

I know there will be torque on the semi circle because it has to reverse motion, but when i try to derive the Lagrangian i have no ∅ to differentiate by so that means (dL/dω) = constant. Which isn't true.

Can someone see what i missed?
 
Io = Ic + mh^2 Io = .5mR2

where h is the distance from o which is at the middle of a circle (top of the semicircle)

so H = R-h for the potential = R(3π-4)/3π

L = .5mv2 + .5ω2[.5mR2 - m(R4/3π)2] -mgH

prof said to use the parallel axis theorem and h is actual the distance between COM and the origin

v= dH/dt ?
 
Hope you can follow this and hope its not too late to be of any use.

Edit, looks like I goofed on a minus sign on the potential twice so things still worked out?
 

Attachments

  • semi066.jpg
    semi066.jpg
    31.9 KB · Views: 11,269
  • semi067.jpg
    semi067.jpg
    25 KB · Views: 2,522
Last edited:
Little to late but i did something similar except i used the fact r was 4r/3pi and i though for small angles cosx equals 1 and sinx equals x
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K