Center of Mass (Subtraction over addition)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the center of mass (CM) for a uniform plate with dimensions 6x7, which has two missing sections of sizes 4x4 and 2x2. The user attempts to derive the CM using the formula coord x = (M1X1 + M2X2 + M3X3 + ... + MiXi)/(M1 + M2 + M3 + ... + Mi) but encounters discrepancies in the results. The correct approach involves treating the missing pieces as negative mass values, leading to confusion about the calculations. Ultimately, the user realizes that their method of subtracting the missing pieces from the total plate's CM was flawed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of center of mass calculations
  • Familiarity with uniform plate properties
  • Knowledge of basic algebra and equations
  • Ability to interpret geometric shapes and dimensions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of negative mass in center of mass calculations
  • Learn about the implications of uniform density in physical systems
  • Explore geometric decomposition techniques for complex shapes
  • Review algebraic manipulation of equations in physics problems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focused on mechanics and center of mass concepts, as well as anyone involved in solving geometric problems related to mass distribution.

Ignitia

Homework Statement


b06OECX.png

Find the coordinates for the center of mass in the picture above. Plate is uniform.

Homework Equations


Since it's uniform, the lengths can be converted to the mass. So:

coord x =(M1X1 +M2X2 + M3X3 + ... +MiXi)/(M1 +M2 + M3 + ... +Mi)
coord y =(M1Y1 +M2Y2 + M3Y3 + ... +MiXi)/(M1 +M2 + M3 + ... +Mi)

I saw it as 3 pieces: the original square, 6x7, and two missing pieces, 2x2 and 4x4.

I'll only put the X equation since Y is similar.

s = plate (shown)
1 = 4x4 missing piece
2 = 2x2 missing piece.
I simply need to find Xs = coords of the plate.

coord x (total, 6x7 square) = 1 = (MsXs +M1X1 + M2X2) / (Ms +M1 + M2)

(Ms +M1 + M2) * 1 = (MsXs +M1X1 + M2X2)
Ms +M1 + M2 - M1X1 - M2X2= MsXs
Ms/Ms +M1/Ms + M2/Ms - M1X1/Ms - M2X2/Ms = Xs

Plugged in the values, it didn't come out correctly. Same for the Y coordinate.

Edit:
Ms/Ms +M1/Ms + M2/Ms - M1X1/Ms - M2X2/Ms = Xs
22/22 + 16/22 + 4/22 - (16/22 (2)) - (4/22 (3)) = -0.090
However, answer given is -0.90

The Attempt at a Solution


I was shown the solution of cutting up the plate into 4 pieces, and finding the CM that way. That came out correct. But I want to know what went wrong when I went 'take whole plate, remove two pieces, find CM' There's probably something really obvious that I'm missing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignitia said:
coord x (total, 6x7 square) = 1 = (MsXs +M1X1 + M2X2) / (Ms +M1 + M2)

(Ms +M1 + M2) * 1 = (MsXs +M1X1 + M2X2)
Ms +M1 + M2 - M1X1 - M2X2= MsXs
Ms/Ms +M1/Ms + M2/Ms - M1X1/Ms - M2X2/Ms = Xs
I do not understand your notation here. Or the equations that you assert. But if M1 is missing then M1 should be regarded as negative.
 
jbriggs444 said:
M1 should be regarded as negative.
Or is it 0? It doesn't take much to prove me wrong sometimes, but I see this as 1's and 0's... is it 1 and -1 or am I totally missing the concept...
 
Sorry, guess I didn't explain it clearly.

mr9Em2z.png


The original plate is grey + red + green, where its CM is x=1. So what I wanted to do was find the X coord of they grey plate only, but I could deduce the red and green's x coords, and their area as well.

So, X (grey+red+green aka total plate) = 1 = (MgreyXgrey + MredXred + MgreenXgreen) / (Mgrey + Mred + Mgreen)
 
Ignitia said:
Ms/Ms +M1/Ms + M2/Ms - M1X1/Ms - M2X2/Ms = Xs
Looks fine to there. Please post subsequent working.
 
Ms/Ms +M1/Ms + M2/Ms - M1X1/Ms - M2X2/Ms = Xs
22/22 + 16/22 + 4/22 - (16/22 (2)) - (4/22 (3)) = -0.090
However, answer given is -0.90
 
Ignitia said:
answer given is -0.90
It could not possibly be that close to the left hand edge of the shape. -0.09 is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ignitia
haruspex said:
It could not possibly be that close to the left hand edge of the shape. -0.09 is correct.

But the given answer -

...

You know what, I'll just accept the fact I spent an hour unable to figure out why my correct answer wasn't the given answer. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K