Center of Mass (Subtraction over addition)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the coordinates for the center of mass of a uniform plate, which is represented as a 6x7 square with two missing pieces. Participants are exploring the implications of using subtraction versus addition in calculating the center of mass.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss different methods for calculating the center of mass, including cutting the plate into pieces versus removing sections. There are questions about the notation used and whether missing mass should be treated as negative. Some participants express confusion about the equations and their implications.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and questioning the validity of their approaches. There is a recognition of a discrepancy between calculated and expected results, and some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of missing mass. However, no consensus has been reached on the correct interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of a homework assignment, which may impose specific rules on how to approach the problem. There is mention of a given answer that does not align with one participant's calculations, leading to further questioning of assumptions and methods.

Ignitia

Homework Statement


b06OECX.png

Find the coordinates for the center of mass in the picture above. Plate is uniform.

Homework Equations


Since it's uniform, the lengths can be converted to the mass. So:

coord x =(M1X1 +M2X2 + M3X3 + ... +MiXi)/(M1 +M2 + M3 + ... +Mi)
coord y =(M1Y1 +M2Y2 + M3Y3 + ... +MiXi)/(M1 +M2 + M3 + ... +Mi)

I saw it as 3 pieces: the original square, 6x7, and two missing pieces, 2x2 and 4x4.

I'll only put the X equation since Y is similar.

s = plate (shown)
1 = 4x4 missing piece
2 = 2x2 missing piece.
I simply need to find Xs = coords of the plate.

coord x (total, 6x7 square) = 1 = (MsXs +M1X1 + M2X2) / (Ms +M1 + M2)

(Ms +M1 + M2) * 1 = (MsXs +M1X1 + M2X2)
Ms +M1 + M2 - M1X1 - M2X2= MsXs
Ms/Ms +M1/Ms + M2/Ms - M1X1/Ms - M2X2/Ms = Xs

Plugged in the values, it didn't come out correctly. Same for the Y coordinate.

Edit:
Ms/Ms +M1/Ms + M2/Ms - M1X1/Ms - M2X2/Ms = Xs
22/22 + 16/22 + 4/22 - (16/22 (2)) - (4/22 (3)) = -0.090
However, answer given is -0.90

The Attempt at a Solution


I was shown the solution of cutting up the plate into 4 pieces, and finding the CM that way. That came out correct. But I want to know what went wrong when I went 'take whole plate, remove two pieces, find CM' There's probably something really obvious that I'm missing.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ignitia said:
coord x (total, 6x7 square) = 1 = (MsXs +M1X1 + M2X2) / (Ms +M1 + M2)

(Ms +M1 + M2) * 1 = (MsXs +M1X1 + M2X2)
Ms +M1 + M2 - M1X1 - M2X2= MsXs
Ms/Ms +M1/Ms + M2/Ms - M1X1/Ms - M2X2/Ms = Xs
I do not understand your notation here. Or the equations that you assert. But if M1 is missing then M1 should be regarded as negative.
 
jbriggs444 said:
M1 should be regarded as negative.
Or is it 0? It doesn't take much to prove me wrong sometimes, but I see this as 1's and 0's... is it 1 and -1 or am I totally missing the concept...
 
Sorry, guess I didn't explain it clearly.

mr9Em2z.png


The original plate is grey + red + green, where its CM is x=1. So what I wanted to do was find the X coord of they grey plate only, but I could deduce the red and green's x coords, and their area as well.

So, X (grey+red+green aka total plate) = 1 = (MgreyXgrey + MredXred + MgreenXgreen) / (Mgrey + Mred + Mgreen)
 
Ignitia said:
Ms/Ms +M1/Ms + M2/Ms - M1X1/Ms - M2X2/Ms = Xs
Looks fine to there. Please post subsequent working.
 
Ms/Ms +M1/Ms + M2/Ms - M1X1/Ms - M2X2/Ms = Xs
22/22 + 16/22 + 4/22 - (16/22 (2)) - (4/22 (3)) = -0.090
However, answer given is -0.90
 
Ignitia said:
answer given is -0.90
It could not possibly be that close to the left hand edge of the shape. -0.09 is correct.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ignitia
haruspex said:
It could not possibly be that close to the left hand edge of the shape. -0.09 is correct.

But the given answer -

...

You know what, I'll just accept the fact I spent an hour unable to figure out why my correct answer wasn't the given answer. Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K