Center of Mass Velocity of rotating object

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the center of mass velocity of a tall object after being struck by a ball in a carnival game scenario. The initial approach incorrectly mixes linear and angular momentum equations, leading to confusion about the conservation laws applied. Participants clarify that the moment of inertia (I) is relevant, but emphasize that the equation used is dimensionally incorrect. There is uncertainty regarding the object's dimensions and whether it rotates about a specific point, which affects the calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clearer definitions and additional information to solve the problem accurately.
qqchan
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


As part of a carnival game, a 0.523-kg ball is thrown at a stack of 19.5-cm tall, 0.227-kg objects and hits with a perfectly horizontal velocity of 9.9 m/s. Suppose the ball strikes the very top of the topmost object as shown to the right. Immediately after the collision, the ball has a horizontal velocity of 3.15 m/s in the same direction, the topmost object now has an angular velocity of 1.64 rad/s about its center of mass and all the objects below are undisturbed. If the object's center of mass is located 13.0 cm below the point where the ball hits, What is the center of mass velocity of the tall object immediately after it is struck?


Homework Equations


L =pr
I=MR2
p=mv
L=Iω


The Attempt at a Solution


p=mv
p = Iω +mballvball
v = (Iω +mballvball)/(mball*r + I)

v = (I*1.64 +0.523*3.15)/(0.523*0.13 + I)
I have calculated this way. However, the teacher said that the method I used to compute the center of mass velocity is wrong. The I value I calculate was correct tho.I would like to know what I did wrong in the process of solving for the center of mass velocity
 
Physics news on Phys.org
qqchan said:
p=mv
p = Iω +mballvball
I assume the first equation represents the linear momentum before impact, so m there stands for mball and v for the initial speed of the ball?
The second one is strange. Iω is an angular momentum. You can't mix that with linear momentum. Is I the moment of inertia of the object about its centre? I don't think it would be merely rotating about its centre after impact.
v = (Iω +mballvball)/(mball*r + I)
I don't see how you get this equation fro the other two.
In fact, there seems to be some missing information in the OP. How wide are the objects? Or are they to be taken as very thin? If they have width, the velocity you are after will not be purely horizontal.
 
haruspex said:
I assume the first equation represents the linear momentum before impact, so m there stands for mball and v for the initial speed of the ball?
The second one is strange. Iω is an angular momentum. You can't mix that with linear momentum. Is I the moment of inertia of the object about its centre? I don't think it would be merely rotating about its centre after impact.

yes, that is right. and I is the moment of inertia of the object about its centre. I could calculate I by using the conservation of linear momentum. However, I do not know what they mean by centre of mass velocity.
 
qqchan said:
I is the moment of inertia of the object about its centre. I could calculate I by using the conservation of linear momentum.
How? As I explained, this equation is dimensionally wrong:
p = Iω +mballvball
p and mballvball are linear momenta, whereas Iω is an angular momentum.
I do not know what they mean by centre of mass velocity.
It's the linear velocity of the mass centre. Suppose the ball comes from the left. If the top object is essentially a rectangle (in the vertical plane containing the trajectory of the ball) then when it is struck it will rotate about its lower right corner. If the distance from that corner to its mass centre is d then its instantaneous centre of mass velocity will be dω.
The OP mentions a diagram. Can you post it? If not, what does the object look like in the diagram?
 
Screen_Shot_2013_12_04_at_3_59_17_PM.png


Here is the image.

I decided to accomplish it this way, but it still didn't work.

v = (mball*vball + mtall*0.13*ω)/(mball + mtall)

I believe I have made it all to the same dimensions
 
qqchan said:
Screen_Shot_2013_12_04_at_3_59_17_PM.png


Here is the image.

I decided to accomplish it this way, but it still didn't work.

v = (mball*vball + mtall*0.13*ω)/(mball + mtall)

Please confirm these definitions:
  • vball is the speed of the ball before impact
  • ω is the angular velocity of the bottle after impact
If so, what is the basis for your equation? What conservation law(s) are you using? How are you arriving at the various before and after values?
Seems to me that there are lots of things wrong with your equation. You're adding before and after values together; you're assuming the bottle CoM and the ball have the same velocity after; you're assuming the CoM velocity after is horizontal...

But I am not at all sure how to solve the question. There is so much missing information. Are we to treat the bottle as zero width? If not, are we to take it that the bottle rotates about its lower right corner, or can it slide?
If we can take it as zero width the question becomes almost trivial and we don't need much of the information provided. We can take the bottle as free floating in space before impact and just use conservation of linear momentum.
Are there more parts to the question? If so, maybe that's where some of the other information comes in.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K