Centre of the ring of quaternions

  • Thread starter Thread starter Wingeer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quaternions Ring
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the center of the ring of quaternions, specifically defined by a set of 2x2 matrices involving complex numbers. Participants are exploring the properties of these matrices and their commutation relations within the context of ring theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to identify elements in the center of the quaternion ring and raises questions about the validity of their approach. Other participants suggest checking specific properties of matrices and their commutation with all elements of the ring.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering hints and corrections regarding the definitions and properties of the matrices involved. There is a focus on ensuring that the mappings and relationships between the quaternion representations are accurately established, particularly concerning ring homomorphisms.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that certain matrices may not belong to the center unless specific conditions are met, highlighting the need for careful examination of commutation across all elements of the ring.

Wingeer
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


What is the centre of the ring of the quaternions defined by:
\mathbf{H}=\{ \begin{pmatrix}<br /> a &amp; b \\<br /> -\bar{b} &amp; \bar{a} \end{pmatrix} | a,b \in \mathbf{C} \}?

Homework Equations



The definition of the centre of a ring:
The centre Z of a ring R is defined by Z(R)=\{A | AX=XA, \forall X \in R\}

The Attempt at a Solution


I figured that multiples of the 2x2 identity matrix must be in the centre.
Also if we denote an element of H by:
\begin{pmatrix} x &amp; y \\<br /> -\bar{y} &amp; \bar{x} \end{pmatrix}
where x=x_1 + ix_2 and similarly for a,b and y that:
1. b\bar{y}=\bar{b}y
2. y(a-\bar{a})=b(x-\bar{x})
3. \bar{b}(x-\bar{x})=\bar{y}(a-\bar{a})

Then for instance we get from the first equation that:
b_2x_1=a_1y_2
But I am not sure whether this approach really is any useful at all. Some hints would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
I actually have another question about the quaternions. I am asked to show that:
\mathbf{H&#039;} = \{ a+bi+cj+dk | a,b,c,d \in \mathbf{R} \}
with: i^2=j^2=k^2=-1, ij=k=-ji, ik=-j=-ki and jk=i=-kj.

is isomorphic as rings to the quaternions defined in the previous post.
I started by noticing that (where x,y are complex numbers):
\begin{pmatrix}<br /> x &amp; y \\<br /> -\bar{x} &amp; \bar{y} \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> a+bi &amp; c+di \\<br /> c-di &amp; a-bi \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}<br /> a &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; a \end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix}<br /> bi &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; bi \end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; c \\<br /> -c &amp; 0 \end{pmatrix} + \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; di \\<br /> di &amp; 0 \end{pmatrix}

And so we see that every element in H is a linear combination of these matrices which all are linearly independent as well. This means we have found a basis for H.
So if we define a function f:H -> H' by:
1= f \left( \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; 1 \end{pmatrix} \right)
i=f \left( \begin{pmatrix}<br /> i &amp; 0 \\<br /> 0 &amp; i \end{pmatrix}\right)
j=f \left( \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; 1 \\<br /> -1 &amp; 0 \end{pmatrix}\right)
k=f \left( \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 0 &amp; i \\<br /> i &amp; 0 \end{pmatrix}\right)

We see that obviously f is both surjective and injective as these are the only values f are defined for. Therefore f is an bijection and H and H' are isomorphic. Do I have to mix ring homomorphisms in this? Or?
 
You've have the right general ideas there. Let's call your matrices M1, Mi, Mj and Mk. By the way, I think you've Mi wrong, check it again. You need to define f for all matrices. But that's easy just define it to be the linear map H->H' defined by your mapping of the basis elements. That you have a bijection between H and H' isn't really in question, because you've mapped the basis for a four dimensional real vector space into the basis of another one. So it's a bijection. Now you have to worry whether it's a ring homomorphism. Ring addition is not a problem just because f is linear. It's multiplication you have to check. If f(xy)=f(x)f(y). For example is f(Mi*Mj)=f(Mi)f(Mj)?
 
Last edited:
note that it is sufficient to check the 16 possible products of M1,Mi,Mj,Mk because of linearity and the distributive laws.

your formula for Mi is indeed wrong, as the lower right coordinate is not the complex conjugate of the upper left coordinate, so that matrix isn't even in H.

*****

with regard to your first problem, note that

[a 0]
[0 a] is not in Z(H) unless a is real, because:

[x+iy .0..][0 i]...[.0.. -y+ix]
[.0.. x-iy][i 0] = [b+ia ...0..]

whereas:

[0 i][x+iy .0.]...[...0.. y+ix]
[i 0][.0.. x-iy] = [-y+ix .0..], these two matrices aren't equal unless y = 0.

remember that an element of Z(H) has to commute with ALL of H, so if you find just ONE element of H a certain matrix doesn't commute with, that matrix cannot be in the center. so i suggest you find which matrices commute with your matrices Mi, Mj and Mk.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K