Centrifugal acceleration - radians^2?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem related to centrifugal acceleration and the units involved, specifically the presence of radians in the equation for acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the meaning of radians in the context of acceleration units and question how they relate to the expected units of m/s². Some participants attempt to clarify the distinction between linear and angular acceleration.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the nature of radians as a dimensionless quantity. Some participants have provided insights into how radians function in the context of angular measurements, contributing to a better understanding of the unit's role in the overall equation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that while radians are not considered an SI unit, they are essential in the context of angular measurements and their relationship to linear quantities.

EinsteinKillr
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm working a problem concerning centrifugal acceleration and I've stumbled on something I don't quite understand:





Homework Equations



F=mrω2 where ω=rad/s

So the resulting units: kg * m*rad2/s2


The Attempt at a Solution



I would expect acceleration to be in unit ms-2


What's up with these radians? What do they mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that there is 'linear acceleration' (i.e. rate of change of linear volocity) in m/s^2
and 'angular acceleration' (i.e. rate of change of angular velocity) in mrad/s^2 but of course radian is not an S.I. unit.
 
Last edited:
'radian' is a measure for an angle.
For example pi radians is equivalent to 180 degrees.
 
Doc Al said:
The radian is a dimensionless quantity. It's a unit of angle (really a ratio) that has no dimension, so the final units of acceleration will be m/s2 as expected. (See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radian#Dimensional_analysis)

I've never consider that a radian is a ratio of a circle. Thanks! that makes a lot more sense.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K