Centrifugal force and angular velocity

Click For Summary
Centrifugal force increases with radius when angular velocity is constant, leading to a greater force required to maintain circular motion. The formula F = m * r * ω² illustrates this relationship, where ω is the angular velocity. Conversely, if tangential velocity is constant, increasing radius results in decreased centrifugal force and a smaller angular velocity. The discussion clarifies that centrifugal force is a fictitious force in non-inertial frames, simplifying to F = m * (v²/r) under certain conditions. Understanding these concepts is essential for grasping the dynamics of rotational motion.
Lsos
Messages
803
Reaction score
9
According to the wikipedia page, when given an angular velocity, centrifugal force increases with radius. I always thought the larger the radius, the smaller the centrifugal force. I think I'm misunderstanding some term here (possibly "angular velocity"). Can someone please explain?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Angular velocity \omega is the rate at which angle changes with respect to time (revolutions per second, degrees per second, radians per second, etc). If this rate is a constant, then the larger your distance to the center r is, the larger the centrifugal force F you will feel.

F = m \;r\;\omega^{2}

However, if you are saying your tangential velocity v = r\;\omega is constant, then the farther out from the center you are, the smaller the centrifugal force you experience, but this also means your angular velocity is smaller too.

F = m \frac{v^{2}}{r}
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi Lsos! :smile:
Lsos said:
… given an angular velocity, centrifugal force increases with radius.

Yes, if the angular velocity is fixed, the larger the radius, the more force you need to keep something in the circle.

Loosely speaking, changing the velocity from v to -v in the same time is obviously a larger acceleration if v is larger! :wink:
I always thought the larger the radius, the smaller the centrifugal force. I think I'm misunderstanding some term here (possibly "angular velocity"). Can someone please explain?

Angular velocity is angle per second.

It's equal to revolutions per second times 2π. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi,
The centrifugal force is a fictitious force used in non-inertial reference frames. In general, it is given by $$ F_{\text{centrifugal}} = m\textbf{w} \times (\textbf{w}\times\textbf{r}). $$ Here, ## \textbf{w} ## is the angular velocity of the rotating reference frame and ## \textbf{r} ## is the position of the particle relative to the rotating frame's origin.

Usually it will simplify to jfizzix' answer (the first equation).

From a more qualitative perspective, imagine a large disc spinning. If you stand near the centre, you move in a small circle but not very fast. As you move out, you move faster and faster and you will find it more difficult to stay on the disc.

:)

PS: I used ##\textbf{w}## because for some reason the TeX code for omega isn't working... :\
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
quarkgazer said:
PS: I used ##\textbf{w}## because for some reason the TeX code for omega isn't working... :\
I think your use of the bold face text is the problem. Latex assumes what follows is text. You can use vectors like this$$ F_{centrifugal} = m\vec{\omega} \times (\vec{\omega} \times \vec{r}) $$

AM
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Ok...yeah. I think I get it. Seems like a very simple concept, but I just need to wrap my aging mind around this. Thanks everyone!
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
643
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
5K