Centripetal Force: Inertial vs Non-Inertial Frame Time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the differences between inertial and non-inertial reference frames, specifically in the context of centripetal force and the motion of a ball attached to a string. The inertial frame allows for straightforward calculations of time taken for the ball to reach the outer circle after the string breaks, yielding the formula t0 = √(r02 - r2) / (rω). In contrast, the non-inertial frame introduces complexities due to the variable forces acting on the ball, which depend on the changing radius. The discussion highlights the necessity of understanding both frames to arrive at equivalent results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of centripetal force and its role in circular motion
  • Familiarity with inertial and non-inertial reference frames
  • Basic knowledge of angular velocity (ω) and linear velocity (v)
  • Proficiency in applying the Pythagorean Theorem in physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of Coriolis force and its implications in non-inertial frames
  • Study differential equations (DE) as they apply to non-inertial reference frames
  • Learn about the mathematical modeling of forces in rotating systems
  • Investigate the principles of classical mechanics in both inertial and non-inertial contexts
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in classical mechanics, particularly those studying motion in different reference frames.

hover
Messages
342
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I've been thinking about inertial and non inertial reference frames. A common example is non rotating reference frame vs a rotating reference frame. As illustration, I have attached two images below. The left is the inertial frame and the right is the non inertial frame.

Inertial Stable.gif
Non Inertial Stable.png


Both images have the same objects in them and only differ by their frame of reference. Inside both frames there is a red ball that is attached to a black string which is connected to the center. In the inertial frame, the ball is being swung around the center as the string provides a centripetal force. In the non inertial frame, the ball "feels" a force pulling it away from the center.

Nothing too special so far. I then thought of asking the following question:

If the string were to break, how long would it take for the ball to reach the outer black circle?

Inertial Break.gif
Non Inertial Break.gif


Now classically, I know that both frames are going to arrive at the same answer. However, the fun comes from seeing how both frames try to arrive at that same answer. The easier of the two frames to deal with is the inertial frame since there are no forces present once the string breaks. Using the image below, I will derive the amount of time it takes:

Distances.png


Assuming that the ball is rotating around the center with an angular speed of \omega and at a distance of r from the center, the velocity of the ball when the string breaks is:

v = r\omega

The distance the ball will travel before it reaches the black circle is L. Now L is a variable dependent on r and r_0 (the radius of the circle). Using the Pythagorean Theorem:

r^2 + L^2 = r_0^2
L^2 = r_0^2-r^2
L = \sqrt{r_0^2-r^2}

So now we can determine the amount of time it takes to be:

t_0 = \frac{L}{v} = \frac{\sqrt{r_0^2-r^2}}{r\omega}

It's a pretty clean result.

Now is the more interesting but complex scenario. How does the non inertial frame go about calculating t_0? I tried to think about it but it starts to get dicey:

F = m*r*\omega^2
a = r*\omega^2

The force pulling the ball down isn't a constant because it is dependent on r which is always changing the second the string breaks. I'm not quite sure how to handle the non inertial problem at this point. I feel that maybe the problem could be answered by trying to setup a DE but I am too rusty on such things. The only thing I do know is that however the non inertial problem arrives at a time, it must equal the value of the inertial frame.

Interesting food for thought to say the least.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget the Coriolis force.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K