Centroid of a Hemisphere in Spherical Coordinates

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The centroid of a hemisphere defined by the equation z=sqrt(a-x^2-y^2) can be accurately calculated using the cross product of the partial derivatives of a parametrization of the surface, rather than the gradient. The surface integral for the z-coordinate of the centroid is given by z(bar)=(1/m)* Surface integral(z dS), where dS is determined by the magnitude of the cross product of the parametrization's partial derivatives. The gradient method yields an incorrect normal vector magnitude, which is crucial for accurate surface integrals in this context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of surface integrals in multivariable calculus
  • Familiarity with parametrization of surfaces
  • Knowledge of cross products in vector calculus
  • Basic concepts of spherical coordinates
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the calculation of surface integrals using parametrization techniques
  • Learn about the properties and applications of cross products in vector calculus
  • Explore the derivation of normals for parametric surfaces
  • Investigate the conversion of Cartesian coordinates to spherical coordinates
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on multivariable calculus, as well as professionals working with geometric modeling and computational geometry.

whereisnomar
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the centroid of the hemisphere, z=sqrt(a-x^2-y^2).


Homework Equations


z(bar)=(1/m)* Surface integral(z dS)
dS= magnitude of the magnitude of normal vector * dA


The Attempt at a Solution


I use the gradient to the hemisphere to get the magnitude of the normal vector... which comes out to be 2a. But the book says to use the cross product of the partial derivatives of a parametrization of the function as a parametric surface. And I get the wrong answer when I use the gradient.

Why can't you use the gradient to get the normal needed for a surface integral?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you say f(x,y)=sqrt(a^2-x^2-y^2) then the position vector on the surface is r=[x,y,f(x,y)]. And if I take the function to find the gradient of as z-f(x,y), then I get that the gradient vector happens to be the same as the cross product r_x x r_y. But neither one of them has norm 2a. Can you show what you did? In general taking a gradient will give you a normal, but it won't necessarily give you the same normal in terms of magnitude as r_x x r_y. The latter is the correct one to use.
 
I would be inclined to write the hemisphere in spherical coordinates with \rho= a.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K