CERN's Large Hadron Collider Makes Its First Beam Circulation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the recent first beam circulation at CERN's Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and the anticipated implications of particle collisions. Participants explore the significance of the LHC, its historical context, and the potential scientific advancements that may arise from its operation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about the immediate benefits of colliding particles, questioning what advancements might arise beyond the novelty of the experiment.
  • It is noted that the LHC uses the same tunnel as the previous Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP), which has been in operation for decades.
  • There is a discussion about the timeline for actual particle collisions, with some participants suggesting that collisions will begin within months, while others argue that it may happen sooner than previously stated.
  • One participant mentions the hope of observing the Higgs Boson, which is linked to the understanding of mass in the current model of Quantum Mechanics.
  • Concerns are raised about the distinction between different types of mass, including the mass of elementary particles and the mass related to dark matter and energy.
  • Some participants highlight the potential technological advancements stemming from the LHC, including impacts on computing and the dissemination of knowledge among scientists.
  • There are mentions of various competing theories in particle physics that may be clarified by new data from the LHC, including extra dimensions and supersymmetry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on the timeline for particle collisions or the specific benefits of the LHC. Multiple competing views on the significance of the LHC and the implications of its findings remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on assumptions about the timeline and outcomes of the LHC's operations, and there are unresolved questions regarding the implications of different types of mass and the nature of the particles involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals curious about particle physics, the history and operation of the LHC, and the broader implications of scientific advancements in technology and theory.

Kabloom
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
So they didn't seem to collide any particles yet? I'm not too knowledgeable about this topic, but it must be something "landmark" as Google altered their logo to inform people about this.

Anyways, there's a link to the article here:

http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/09/first-beam-circ.html


And pictures can be seen here:

http://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/OPERATIONS/prodSys/atlasoracleadmin/10Sep2008/beam/index.php

My apologies if this was already posted


Oh, and a question: What great advancements science will be made by colliding particles in a 17-mile long circle will happen other than doing something no man has ever done before? I'm really new to physics and I don't clearly see this benefits. It sounds really cool though :P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
malawi_glenn said:
They will start colliding particles within a couple of months, then they must increase the energy slightly. Maybe in 2years they have reached full energy on the beam.

Not two years, much sooner than that. The 14 TeV collisions are expected to begin in early 2009.
 
Kabloom said:
...Oh, and a question: What great advancements science will be made by colliding particles in a 17-mile long circle will happen other than doing something no man has ever done before? I'm really new to physics and I don't clearly see this benefits. It sounds really cool though :P


One thign they hope to do is finally observe (indirectly) the Higg's Boson. You see, physicists have been working for years on the current model of Quantum Mechanics, and it's pretty good. It accounts for a lot of the properties and behaviors of physical matter, with one glaring omission; there is no explanation for why things have the property called "mass". The model was altered (by some guy named Higgs, I'm guessing) to include a prediction of a particle responsible for mass, and the LHC may have enough energy to produce this particle.
 
LURCH said:
there is no explanation for why things have the property called "mass". The model was altered (by some guy named Higgs, I'm guessing) to include a prediction of a particle responsible for mass, and the LHC may have enough energy to produce this particle.
Watch out not to confuse the mass of elementary particles, the mass of "things" like your own (which comes from QCD and not the Higgs), or even "dark matter/energy. All those are different problems.
 
malawi_glenn said:
They will start colliding particles within a couple of months, .

http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=7368
=======quote=========
The LHC, the largest and most expensive scientific instrument ever built, will begin the actual high-energy collisions of protons October 21
=====end of quote======
 
Nick.M said:
http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=7368
=======quote=========
The LHC, the largest and most expensive scientific instrument ever built, will begin the actual high-energy collisions of protons October 21
=====end of quote======


largest? Though LEP was as large as LHC since LHC uses LEP tunnel? ;-)

But those high energy pp collisions is not at 14TeV.
 
If things go well, the first collisions may occur pretty soon, although at a relatively low energy. However, it should already be enough to do several fine-tunning tasks in all systems by searching for some well-known particles so that all instruments can be better calibrated; for example, by reconstructing J/psi particles (discovered in 1974 or so), one can make sure that the momentum reconstruction puts it on the correct mass (as measured by several experiments before LHC).

After this first run at low energy, there will be some data collected at 10TeV, and then the start of the 14TeV run.
 
In terms of the benefits from this endeavor:
1. The technologies developed for the analysis of the massive amount of LHC data may have a strong impact in the way people use computers (google for "the grid")
2. In the medium term, several thousands of solidly trained scientists will be able to return to their countries to disseminate first hand knowledge of "the largest and most expensive scientific instrument ever built"
3. From the current understanding of particle physics, plus constraints from experiments done so far, there are several competing theories possible. New data will point out which ones to pursue. Extra dimensions, the mechanism that gives particles mass, microscopic black holes, supersymmetry, and new particles are among the possible outcomes.
4. Basic science usually pays off mainly in the long term. Going from someone doing strange experiments with magnets in a lab to you reading this lines through a world-wide network of interconnected computers takes knowledge of the very intricate details of how to cleverly arrange a few grams of silicon, a lot of work by many generations and, mainly, a daring imagination.
 
  • #10
ahrkron touched on this, but also, for the laymen like me, it is important to note that many of the advances in computers in recent decades have come from CERN experiments, most notably one of the precursors of the modern internet. I for one eagerly await what incredible advances this brings with it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
13K