Master the Chain Rule with These Easy Steps - Check Your Work for Accuracy!

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the chain rule in calculus, specifically for the function w = -xy - 5yz + 3xz, with variables defined as x = st, y = exp(st), and z = t^2. The user attempts to compute dw/ds at the point (s=5, t=-2) but arrives at an incorrect result of 375.01, which does not match the expected outcome of -7.9982294. The user expresses frustration over repeated checks of their work without identifying the error in their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the chain rule in calculus
  • Familiarity with partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their derivatives
  • Ability to substitute values into multivariable functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the application of the chain rule with multivariable functions
  • Practice calculating partial derivatives for functions of multiple variables
  • Explore the properties of exponential functions and their derivatives
  • Learn techniques for verifying calculations in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, educators teaching multivariable calculus, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of the chain rule and its applications in complex functions.

Whatupdoc
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
chain rule agian - check my work please

w = -xy-5yz+3xz, x = st, y = exp(st), z = t^2

dw/ds(5,-2) = ________________________

here's what i did:

dw/ds = dw/dx*dx/ds + dw/dy*dy/ds + dw/dz*dz/ds
dw/ds = (3z-y)*(t) + (-x-5z)(exp(st)*t) + (3x-5y)(0)

plug in x,y and z...

dw/ds = (3(t^2)-(exp(st)))*(t) + (-(st)-5(t^2))(exp(st)*t) + (3(st)-5(exp(st)))(0)

now plug in s=5 and t=-2...

dw/ds = (3(5^2)-(exp(5*-2)))*(5) + (-(5*-2)-5(5^2))(exp(5*-2)*-2) + (3(5*-2)-5(exp(5*-2)))(0) = 375.01 which is incorrect. i checked my work three times and i can't find the problem, which means I am doing something wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got -8+39e^{-10} = -7.9982294..., which differs from your result. Is that correct?

I substituted s and t into x, y, and z, so that I didn't have to do the extra step of writing everything out in terms of s and t.

Carl
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K