Undergrad Chain rule and change of variables again

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the chain rule in calculus, specifically when considering the second derivative of y with respect to x, denoted as d2y/dx2, while treating x as a function of y. The equation d2y/dx2 = -d2x/dy2 / (dx/dy)3 is questioned, particularly the presence of the cubic term in the denominator. Participants clarify that the chain rule is used to derive this relationship, leading to a deeper understanding of the derivatives involved. There is also confusion regarding the differentiation of functions when switching the independent and dependent variables, emphasizing the need for clarity in variable roles. Overall, the conversation aims to demystify the second-order derivative transformation through the chain rule.
jonjacson
Messages
450
Reaction score
38
We start with:

d2y/dx2

And we want to consider x as function of y instead of y as function of x.

I understand this equality:

dy/dx = 1/ (dx/dy)

But for the second order this equality is provided:

d2y/dx2 =- d2x/dy2 / (dx/dy)3

Does anybody understand where is it coming from? The cubic term in the denominator looks quite strange, I don't know how to understand that equation.

ANy help is welcome.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jonjacson said:
We start with:

d2y/dx2

And we want to consider x as function of y instead of y as function of x.

I understand this equality:

dy/dx = 1/ (dx/dy)

But for the second order this equality is provided:

d2y/dx2 =- d2x/dy2 / (dx/dy)3

Does anybody understand where is it coming from? The cubic term in the denominator looks quite strange, I don't know how to understand that equation.

ANy help is welcome.
Write your second equation above as ##dy/dx = (dx/dy)^{-1}##
Now take the derivative with respect to x of both sides:
##d^2y/dx^2 = (-1) (dx/dy)^{-2} \cdot d/dx(dx/dy)##
On the right side above, I'm using the chain rule.
Is that enough of a start?
 
Mark44 said:
Write your second equation above as ##dy/dx = (dx/dy)^{-1}##
Now take the derivative with respect to x of both sides:
##d^2y/dx^2 = (-1) (dx/dy)^{-2} \cdot d/dx(dx/dy)##
On the right side above, I'm using the chain rule.
Is that enough of a start?

It looks like a great start but I have a question.

If we have x as function of y, dx/dy will be a function of y too, WHat is the meaning of deriving this respect to x?
X is the independent variable now, Does it make sense to differenciate a function respect itself?

Maybe I am confused and I should go to bed.
 
jonjacson said:
It looks like a great start but I have a question.

If we have x as function of y, dx/dy will be a function of y too, WHat is the meaning of deriving this respect to x?
You can differentiate it with respect to x (not derive it).
jonjacson said:
X is the independent variable now
No, if x is a function of y, x is the dependent variable, and y is the independent variable.
jonjacson said:
, Does it make sense to differenciate a function respect itself?

Maybe I am confused and I should go to bed.
In the last part of what I wrote I have ##d/dx(dx/dy)##. That's the same as ##\frac d {dy} \left(\frac {dx}{dy} \right)\cdot \frac{dy}{dx}##, with the chain rule being applied once more.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
17K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K