Chain rule for partial derivatives

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of the chain rule for partial derivatives in the context of polar coordinates. The user initially attempts to express the partial derivatives u_x and u_y in terms of u_r and u_t, leading to a series of equations. After some back-and-forth, the correct formulation is established: u_y = (u_t cos t + u_r r sin t) / (r cos^2 t + r sin^2 t). The user also clarifies the derivation of the relationships x_t = -r sin t and y_t = r cos t, which are essential for the transformation between Cartesian and polar coordinates.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial derivatives and the chain rule.
  • Familiarity with polar coordinates and their relationship to Cartesian coordinates.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their application in calculus.
  • Experience with linear equations and substitution methods in calculus.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the chain rule for multiple variables in polar coordinates.
  • Explore the application of trigonometric identities in calculus problems.
  • Learn about the transformation between Cartesian and polar coordinates in depth.
  • Investigate advanced topics in multivariable calculus, such as Jacobians and their applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying multivariable calculus, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of the chain rule in different coordinate systems.

hholzer
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
If I have u = u(x,y) and let (r, t) be polar coordinates, then
expressing u_x and u_y in terms of u_r and u_t could be
done with a system of linear equations in u_x and u_y?

I get:
u_r = u_x * x_r + u_y * y_r

u_t = u_x * x_t + u_y * y_t

is this the right direction? Because by substitution,
I end up with:
(u_t* x_r - u_r)/(y_t*x_r - y_r) = u_y which
does not seem right, considering:
u_y = u_r * r_y + u_t * t_y

Any insight to the problem is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that should be

(u_t x_r - u_r x_t ) / (y_t x_r - x_t y_r) = u_y

and since

x_r = cos t
y_r = sin t

x_t = -r sin t
y_t = r cos t

it implies that u_y = (u_t cos t + u_r r sin t) / (r cos t cos t + r sin t sin t) = u_t cos t / r + u_r sin t
 
I found my error. Thanks for your response!

One question:
How did you determine the following:
x_t = -r sin t
y_t = r cos t
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K