Chain Rule in 2D Function Transformation

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Julio1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Chain rule
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the transformation of the second-order partial differential equation under a change of variables defined by \( u = x + 2y + 2 \) and \( v = x - y - 1 \). By applying the chain rule, the original equation \( 2\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x \partial y} - \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial y} = 0 \) is transformed into \( 3\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u \partial v} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial u} = 0 \). The transformation utilizes the relationships between the derivatives with respect to \( x \) and \( y \) and those with respect to \( u \) and \( v \), demonstrating the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order partial differential equations
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of variable transformation techniques
  • Proficiency in differentiating functions of multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in multivariable calculus
  • Explore variable transformation methods in partial differential equations
  • Learn about the Schwarz theorem and its implications for mixed partial derivatives
  • Investigate the properties of \( C^2 \) functions in the context of differential equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with multivariable calculus, particularly those involved in solving partial differential equations and applying variable transformations.

Julio1
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Let $z:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}$ an function of kind $C^2(\mathbb{R}^2)$. What transforms the equation $2\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2}+\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x\partial y}-\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y}=0$ under the change of variable $u=x+2y+2$ and $v=x-y-1$?

Hi, I have this problem I don't understand how to solve it. I have calculated the following:

$\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x}=\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}=\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}.$

$\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y}=\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}=2\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}-\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}.$

However, the case $\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2}$ I don't understand how solve, anyone can help me?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Julio said:
Let $z:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}$ an function of kind $C^2(\mathbb{R}^2)$. What transforms the equation $2\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2}+\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x\partial y}-\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y}=0$ under the change of variable $u=x+2y+2$ and $v=x-y-1$?

Hi, I have this problem I don't understand how to solve it. I have calculated the following:

$\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x}=\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}=\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}.$

$\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial y}=\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}=2\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}-\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}.$

However, the case $\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2}$ I don't understand how solve, anyone can help me?

By the chain rule, note that

\[\frac{\partial}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial u} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial v}\]

(and similarly with respect to $y$). Therefore, for $u=x+2y+2$ and $v=x-y-1$, you should have that

\[\begin{aligned} \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2} &= \frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left[\frac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right] \\ &= \left(\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial u} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial v}\right) \left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial u}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial v}\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)\\ &= \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial u}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial v}\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial v} \left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial u}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial v}\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)\\ &= \frac{\partial}{\partial u}\left( \frac{\partial z}{\partial u} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial v}\right) + \frac{\partial}{\partial v}\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial u} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial v}\right) \\ &= \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u^2} + 2\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u\partial v} + \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial v^2}\end{aligned}\]

In a similar manner (verify),

\[\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2} = 4\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u^2} - 4\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u\partial v} + \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial v^2}\]

and (verify)

\[\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x \partial y} = 2\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u^2} + \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u\partial v} - \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial v^2}\]

Therefore,

\[2\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2} + \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x\partial y} - \frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial y^2} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial y} = 0 \implies 3\frac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u\partial v} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial u} = 0\]

Is this what you were after?

I hope this made sense! (Smile)
 
Chris L T521 said:
Is this what you were after?

I hope this made sense! (Smile)

Hello Chris L T521 :), yes, that's what should do. Sorry, I wanted to express it better in English, but I could not.

Chris L T521 said:
By the chain rule, note that
\[\frac{\partial}{\partial x} = \frac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial u} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x} \frac{\partial}{\partial v}\]
Thanks for helping, but know I do not quite understand this. What I understand from this is that $\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}=D^{0},$ namely $\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}$ is an operator, but is possible do $D^{0}=\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}\cdot D^{0}+\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\cdot D^0.$ In other words, is only one notation?, because $\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}$ it should not be understood as a fraction, or as a product fraction, but is an differential.

Chris L T521 said:
\begin{aligned} &= \dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial u}\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial u}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial v}\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right) + \frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\frac{\partial}{\partial v} \left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial u}\frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial v}\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)\\ &= \frac{\partial}{\partial u}\left( \frac{\partial z}{\partial u} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial v}\right) + \frac{\partial}{\partial v}\left(\frac{\partial z}{\partial u} + \frac{\partial z}{\partial v}\right) \\
\end{aligned}

Thanks, but know you that I don't understand how pass from the third to the fourth line?. Is there something that simplify? :confused:
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I solved so:

$\begin{eqnarray*}
\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial x^2}&=&\dfrac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial x}\right)\\
&=&\left(\dfrac{\partial }{\partial u}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}+\dfrac{\partial}{\partial v}\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\right)\left(\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}+\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}\right)\\
&=&\dfrac{\partial}{\partial u}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}+\dfrac{\partial}{\partial u}\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}+\dfrac{\partial}{\partial v}\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial u}+\dfrac{\partial}{\partial v}\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\dfrac{\partial z}{\partial v}\\
&=&\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u^2}+\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u\partial v}+\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial v\partial u}+\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}\dfrac{\partial ^2 z}{\partial v^2}\\
&=&\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u^2}+\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u\partial v}+\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial v\partial u}+\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial v^2}\\
&\overbrace{=}^{\text{Schwarz}}&\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u^2}+2\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial u\partial v}+\dfrac{\partial^2 z}{\partial v^2}.
\end{eqnarray*}
$

In analogy with the others, okay?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K