Change a variable to transform a series into a power series

Click For Summary
To transform the given series into a power series, a change of variable is necessary, specifically introducing a new variable y that relates to x. The goal is to express the series in the form of a power series, which involves manipulating the general term to fit the desired format. A suggested substitution is y = 1/(x + 1), which simplifies the series appropriately. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly defining the variable to facilitate the transformation and convergence analysis. Ultimately, understanding the relationship between x and y is crucial for determining convergence in the context of power series.
whitejac
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The following series are not power series, but you can transform each one into a power
series by a change of variable and so find out where it converges.

0 ((3n(n+1)) / (x+1)n

Homework Equations



a power series is a series of the form:

a0 + a1x + a2x^2 ... + ...

The Attempt at a Solution



What exactly does it mean by transforming a power series by changing a variable? the only thing I could look up and find was converting to another coordinate plane in calculus 3 which would be further along than this problem focuses on... but i am still confused as i can't see how a series can be in a separate plane like that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Introduce a new variable ##y## as a function of ##x##, such that if you write your series in terms of ##y## it takes the form of a power series. Then determine for which values of ##y## that power series converges. Finally, translate these values back to values of ##x##.
 
Let me see if i understand this then...

Let Y = Y(x),
Where Y(x) = 1 / (x - 1)

Then we would have:

3n(n+1) / ( 1/ (x -1 +1)n)
= 3n(n+1) (x)n

this would in turn be a power series, yes?
 
whitejac said:
Let me see if i understand this then...

Let Y = Y(x),
Where Y(x) = 1 / (x - 1)
No, this isn't the substitution. There is another that should be much more obvious.
whitejac said:
Then we would have:

3n(n+1) / ( 1/ (x -1 +1)n)
= 3n(n+1) (x)n

this would in turn be a power series, yes?
You have a series whose general term is ##3^n(n + 1) \cdot \frac 1 {(x + 1)^n}##. You'd like to end up with ##3^n(n + 1) \cdot y^n##. What's the most obvious substitution to make?
 
how is mine not obvious enough? It removes the added 1 and puts y back in the numerator.
 
Sorry, I meant for my original definition of y to be:
x = 1/y -1
then you would have the relationship I intended to have:

Mark44 said:
3n(n+1)⋅yn
 
whitejac said:
Sorry, I meant for my original definition of y to be:
x = 1/y -1
That works, but why not write it as ##y = \frac 1 {x + 1}##?
Then ##y^n = \frac 1 {(x + 1)^n}##
 
So, essentially, my answer could work but you could also simply say "Let y = all of the business that makes this difficult"?
 
whitejac said:
So, essentially, my answer could work but you could also simply say "Let y = all of the business that makes this difficult"?
No, not really.

whitejac said:
Sorry, I meant for my original definition of y to be:
x = 1/y -1
When you define something (in this case, y), you generally start it with "Let y = <whatever> ". What you wrote is the inverse of the function that defines y.
 
  • Like
Likes whitejac
  • #10
Mark44 said:
No, not really.

When you define something (in this case, y), you generally start it with "Let y = <whatever> ". What you wrote is the inverse of the function that defines y.

Yeah, I noticed that. I guess it makes sense. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K